Federal government spends millions on hoop houses

Monday, January 17, 2011 | 10:59 a.m. CST; updated 10:20 a.m. CST, Tuesday, January 18, 2011
In this Jan. 13 photo, farmer Earl Snell stands next to greenhouse-like structures called high tunnels on his rural farm in Skippersville, Ala. Snell said he now can grow the tomatoes year-round and compete with southern Florida growers, who have been dealing with a severe freeze that caused prices to rise.

MINNEAPOLIS — The federal government has spent millions of dollars to help farmers nationwide buy greenhouse-like structures called high tunnels that can add valuable weeks and even months to their growing seasons by protecting produce from chilly temperatures.

About $13 million has gone to more than 2,400 farmers in 43 states to help pay for the low-tech tunnels that look like a cross between Quonset huts and conventional greenhouses. The structures, also known as hoop houses, have been particularly beneficial in the north, where they allow farmers to plant as much as four weeks early and keep growing later in the fall.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture touts the tunnels as environmentally friendly and a way to help meet the demand for local and sustainable produce. Experts say high tunnels employ efficient drip irrigation systems and reduce pest problems, diseases and fertilizer costs.

One of the biggest advocates is Terry Nennich, an extension educator at the University of Minnesota-Crookston, who first learned of them on a 1999 trip to Normandy in northern France. Few U.S. farmers were using high tunnels then, he said.

The French are "kind of light years ahead of us," Nennich said. "People there are more concerned about their food and pesticides and quality and freshness. Their climate isn't as severe in the wintertime but they don't have a lot of heat up there in the summer."

High tunnels typically consist of a series of hoops covered with plastic that can be rolled up on the sides to allow air circulation. Prices vary by size, but they often cost just a few thousand dollars. The USDA does not keep statistics on their use or how much produce is grown in them.

They have been a "game changer" for Earl Snell, who grows organic heirloom tomatoes in two tunnels near Skipperville in southeastern Alabama.

Snell said he now can grow the tomatoes year-round and compete with southern Florida farmers, who usually produce most of the nation's winter tomatoes. An unusual, severe freeze in Florida this year has damaged crops and pushed up produce prices.

"I got some nice looking tomatoes right now. And of course everything is up, so we're hitting the market just perfect here," Snell said.

To promote high tunnels, the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service started a three-year pilot program through its "Know Your Farmer, Know Your Food" initiative. It provided $13 million in the fiscal year that ended last Sept. 30, and more money is available this year.

USDA Deputy Secretary Kathleen Merrigan said the program supports the agency's mission in helping small- and mid-sized farms thrive and in encouraging sound conservation practices. She said interested farmers should contact their local NRCS offices.

"It really is a great opportunity for farmers who want to extend their season and add some money to their bottom line," Merrigan said.

Tomatoes are probably the most profitable high tunnel crop, but cucumbers and peppers also generate good return, said Karl Foord, a University of Minnesota extension educator in Farmington. Farmers and researchers nationwide also use high tunnels for strawberries, raspberries, melons, salad greens, onions, sweet corn, ginger and flowers.

Mark Boen just added his eighth high tunnel at his farm near Fergus Falls in northwestern Minnesota, where he describes the weather as "winter, winter, winter."

He plans to use his newest tunnel to start growing romaine lettuce far earlier in the spring than he could otherwise. He said the tunnels have increased his tomato production, and the fruit is ready at least a month earlier than normal. Boen can harvest cucumbers almost two months early.

"The season is so short that high tunnels really make a difference," he said.

His high tunnels are relatively large at 30 feet by 96 feet. Each of the four he uses for tomatoes hold about 450 plants, which he said yield an average of about 50 pounds per plant per season. That adds up to about 22,000 pounds per tunnel and a nice income. He sells most of his produce directly to consumers.

Snell's primary crops were peanuts and watermelons before he built his high tunnels last winter. His hold about 400 tomato plants each, and he sells to restaurants, grocers and consumers. He said he and his wife are so pleased they plan to add three more.

While the federal program typically covers about half of the cost of a high tunnel, Snell, who is African-American, qualified under a provision for "historically underserved producers" that picks up 75 percent to 90 percent.

"I couldn't have done it without them. . . . It's saved us," Snell said.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Chris Cady January 18, 2011 | 12:58 p.m.

How simple is that. I'd much rather have locally or regionally grown produce in the off-season than food shipped in from somewhere with little control over quality and food safety. W00t!

I was puzzled by the title though. Couldn't "gov't. spends millions" apply to a huge number of stories? This comes across as touch of editorial comment to me.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz January 18, 2011 | 2:02 p.m.

Seems to me the headline is pretty spot-on with the details in the story. Why can't farmers be expected to pay for their own hoop houses, especially if they only cost a few thousand dollars?

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams January 18, 2011 | 5:11 p.m.

Someone with a hoop-house chime in.

I want to know how you deal with fungi in a warm, high-humidity environment.

(Report Comment)
Dan Holland January 18, 2011 | 6:56 p.m.

my tomatoes and peppers do pretty good during the growing season but looking at the picture with this article makes me wonder if the government will give me several thousand dollars if i go out and spend a few hundred on a few rolls of plastic and a roll of black pipe. i can build something just as cheap and ugly in my yard as the one in the picture.

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire January 18, 2011 | 7:31 p.m.

I think you are supposed to roll up the plastic as soon as the temperature allows. Or transplant your crop. That should prevent a fungus infestation.

(Report Comment)
Corey Parks January 18, 2011 | 10:59 p.m.

For 4000 dollars I will come and build a hoop house in less then 4 days. :)

I will say after doing the math and assuming the 13 mill was divided by 2400 "farmers" is accurate it is probably one of the least wreck less spending per person at $5,416. Most govt programs break down to 10's if not hundreds of thousand per person.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.