MU scholar defends Huckleberry Finn revision

Tuesday, February 8, 2011 | 8:01 p.m. CST; updated 7:15 p.m. CST, Wednesday, February 9, 2011

COLUMBIA — MU English professor Thomas Quirk on Tuesday defended an effort to sanitize Mark Twain's masterpiece as an honest attempt to bring the author to more readers.

The Twain scholar was addressing a controversy stirred by Auburn University Professor Alan Gribben, who has revised "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn."

Gribben, a faculty member at Auburn's Montgomery campus, and NewSouth Books plan to release an edition this month that replaces the N-word with “slave.”

Quirk called Gribben a first-rate scholar and said his endeavor was an “authentic gesture” to return the book to public schools where it has been banned.

Quirk's lecture, "The Sanitizing of Huck Finn," was a Black History Month event held in MU's Gentry Hall.

Other Twain scholars thought Gribben had gone over to the “dark side,” Quirk said. He noted that the book is in the public domain and everyone has the right to revise it.

Quirk said that he agrees with Gribben that the novel overuses the N-word and that it is often modified in translation. The book has been printed in dozens of languages, he said, without including the offensive term.

Quirk said he also sympathizes with grade school teachers who have to teach it, calling it a “tough book.”

“At what age do children develop a capacity for irony?” Quirk asked. “Whatever that magical age should be, 'Huck Finn' should not be taught before that time."

The committee that scheduled Black History Month speakers decided that asking Quirk to discuss “Huck Finn” would be timely, said co-chair Peggy Placier.

The issue is especially relevant to people who teach, said Placier, an associate professor in MU’s College of Education.

“The intention of Gribben is to make this work acceptable so they can use it in public schools,” she said.

Despite the objective, she said she believes changing Twain’s work “still does damage to the authorial voice and the historical reality” of the text.

Quirk seemed to be trying to work through the contradiction himself.

He said he would not use the sanitized version in his classroom, as a college professor.

Furthermore, if he were a middle school teacher, he said he would not assign either the sanitized or the original version. The  book is too difficult for young readers to comprehend, he said.

"It's not a book for boys, but it's a book for adults who used to be boys," Quirk said, quoting Twain.

One truth about Twain’s work transcends the controversy, he said.

“People throughout the world really love this book."

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Ellis Smith February 9, 2011 | 9:22 a.m.

Both American and international literary critics have long cited Mark Twain's "Huckleberry Finn" as being the finest example of the American novel. So now some pathetic want-to-be critics have decided to tinker with it.

Is this a case of those who can write, write; those who can't write, teach?

So what literary work will be next for the "red pencil" treatment?

(Report Comment)
Delcia Crockett February 9, 2011 | 10:20 a.m.

"Gone with the Wind" and "To Kill a Mockingbird" next?

Cannot anyone explain to a precocious child, full of questions and reading classic literature from the great authors of their era, "This characterization of this particular fictional work depicts the mindset of some people who were prejudiced, and it was wrong to use that vernacular/term, but it happened"?

Like they quote in journalism, "Just tell it like it is, and let the reader decide."

(Report Comment)
Eric Cox February 10, 2011 | 10:05 p.m.

There is no defense, this is a classic work written in another era, Thomas Quirk doesn't have the literary credit to edit Mark Twain. Good god I hear that word almost everyday blaring from the stereo of a car being driven by a non-Caucasian. Besides it's already written and Twain has been dead for 100 years, you can't change Huck Finn you can only make imperfect copies, that book was what it is and always will be, long before Thomas Quirk was a twinkle in his daddy's eye.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.