advertisement

Missouri's universities brace for higher education budget cuts

Wednesday, February 16, 2011 | 11:01 p.m. CST; updated 9:03 a.m. CST, Thursday, February 17, 2011

JEFFERSON CITY — Presidents of Missouri's universities fielded questions Wednesday about how their respective schools would cope with proposed reductions to the state's higher education budget.

The House Education Appropriations Committee heard testimony about the financial state of Missouri's universities. Some university presidents said the governor's proposed 7 percent cut to higher education would put a strain on their budgets.

"The cuts present a significant challenge," said Robert Vartabedian, president of Missouri Western State University.

But representatives from other institutions said they had braced for the budget reductions and the proposed cuts won't create a substantial problem.

"We have been preparing for this for the past two years," said Paul Kincaid, Missouri State University chief of staff.

Lawmakers submitted questions to the universities prior to the hearing. University presidents were asked what measures they were taking to reduce their operating budgets and how they would be affected by budget cuts of up to 15 percent.

All of the universities, who were represented at the hearing, plan to increase tuition for the upcoming academic year.

Representatives from the University of Missouri System were vocal about the need for state funds for other things, such as faculty retention and research.

Steve Owens, interim president of the UM System, said UM's low faculty salaries and increased faculty mobility across the nation could cause a decrease in the quality of education.

"Our best and brightest might be moving on," he said.

Owens also pointed out that the UM System has conducted $371 million in research using funds from outside their appropriations. He said this same research benefits Missouri's economic development.

Many lawmakers acknowledged that the proposed budget cuts would be necessary, but Rep. Mary Still, D-Columbia, said she thinks there are other options.

"There are many avenues for raising revenue, and a cigarette tax would be one of the easiest," Still said.

Still said she believes the state's first priority is education and increasing the general revenue could mean reduced cuts for higher education.

Representatives of Missouri's universities said they have taken steps to reduce their budgets. A spokesperson for Missouri Southern State University said they have fewer administrators now than they did 12 years ago, when enrollment was higher.

Other institutions have put building repairs and projects on hold. Carolyn Mahoney, Lincoln University president, said a 7 percent budget cut would cause facility maintenance to take a backseat.

Owens said the UM System has been able to do "more with less" with declining appropriations from the state.

A primary source of budget reductions for the universities has been the elimination of academic degree programs.

Scholarship programs have also taken a hit. Lincoln University has cut its scholarship budget by 19 percent, Mahoney said.

Despite efforts to reduce operating budgets, the UM System will raise its tuition 5.5 percent, to an average of $8,400 per student (not including room and board). Missouri's other public universities face the same fate.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Ellis Smith February 17, 2011 | 6:33 a.m.

"A primary source of budget reductions for the universities has been the elimination of academic degree programs."

Oh, really? You wouldn't mind attaching some actual dollar figures to that statement, would you? Does elimination of a program always or even usually result in faculty reduction, and therefore elimination of salaries? How much was it costing to retain unused programs on the books?

As I recall, these "reductions" were FORCED on the universities; they weren't the universities' idea or weren't made voluntarily.

The information should be available under Missouri's Sunshine Law. I'd settle for only the dollars for each of the the four campuses (individually) of University of Missouri System.

After all, Truman State University didn't even find it necessary to eliminate any programs. What does that suggest?

(Report Comment)
Jordan Shapiro February 17, 2011 | 7:59 a.m.

Actually Truman State has eliminated nearly half of their academic programs in the last 25 years (as they testified yesterday). They have not needed to eliminate any recently because it has been an ongoing process of cutting unnecessary or redundant programs for that university.

And Universities were forced to make an Academic Review, they were not forced to get any programs only to review their degree portfolio.

And "A primary source of budget reductions for the universities has been the elimination of academic degree programs."--comes from the testimonies of the 12 public universities that testified yesterday. The committee asked each president what measures were being taken to reduce the budget and they all listed the reduction in academic programs as a source of budget reduction.

Unfortunately when a 4 hour committee hearing is covered some things are not able to be included in a story. I hope this helps and if you have any more questions please don't hesitate to ask.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith February 17, 2011 | 9:59 a.m.

It's unfortunate that the testimony of Truman State University was not mentioned in the original Missourian article.

(Well, those folks are of minor importance, right?)

It seems clear that we have some Missouri public universities that have an ongoing policy of monitoring and improving their operations and - unfortunately - we also have some public universities that don't.

It's also becoming more clear which universities fall into which of those two categories.

(Report Comment)
Delcia Crockett February 17, 2011 | 2:32 p.m.

From article:
"Scholarship programs have also taken a hit."

Response:
That is a shame.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements