LETTER: U.S. forces should be slow to attack Libya further
Thursday, March 24, 2011 | 10:14 a.m. CDT;
updated 6:01 p.m. CDT, Monday, March 28, 2011
Below is one reader's response to the Missourian's Today's Question for Monday, in which we asked if the U.S. was justified in attacking Libya's ground forces last weekend.
Yes, I think what the U.S. did in bombing Libya was a good thing. It is sad that it had to come to this point because war of any sort should not be taken lightly. The cause seems warranted because of the human rights violations under Moammar Gadhafi. I don't think that we should move much farther than we already have in attacking Libyan forces. The U.S. and British forces have given the people of Libya and the rebel forces a chance to change their country themselves and that is how it should be.
Christopher Wendel lives in Columbia.
Like what you see here? Become a member.
Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.
You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.
Leave a comment
Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines
outlined below and register with our site.
You must be logged in to comment. (Our
full comment policy is here.)
- Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
- Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or
discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
- Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will
be published with every comment.
(Read why we ask for that here.)
- Don’t solicit or promote businesses.
We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see
something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.
You must be logged in to comment.