J. KARL MILLER: Prop. B debate has historical context

Wednesday, April 27, 2011 | 2:22 p.m. CDT; updated 11:43 a.m. CDT, Thursday, April 28, 2011

There appears to be no end to the clamor over the Missouri legislature's efforts to repair or rescind the statute called for in Proposition B, the "Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act." The St. Louis Post-Dispatch and the Kansas City Star editorial pages have both come down on the side of those who are extremely vocal in their beliefs that the will of the people — a majority of whom voted in favor of Proposition B — is sacrosanct and should be left to stand as written.

Even a compromise brokered by Gov. Nixon has failed to move publications such as the Kansas City Star and some of the most vociferous anti-puppy mill activists. Claiming the agreement would do too little to improve dog-breeding conditions, they recommend vetoing the legislature's bill and enabling Proposition B to take effect without further concessions.

Castigating the legislature for even considering overrule of the will of the voters has been a very popular tactic among many. Along with the legislature's overturning the people's vote against the concealed carry law in 1999 and the Missouri House vote to revoke a voter-approved statute basing the minimum wage on the rate of inflation, modification/repeal of "the puppy mill law" has attained public enemy status.

There is no doubt of the importance of the will of the people and of a place for voter-approved laws — so long as there is method of adjustment to limit or remove unintended consequences. Nevertheless, it is obvious from the ill-educated outcry over the General Assembly's alleged meddling with Proposition B, many need a basic civics lesson.

First and foremost, the United States was not established as a democracy but instead as a republican (small r) form of government. That distinction was offered by one of the founders, James Madison, who warned of a "tyranny of the majority," using the short-lived Athens experiment as his model. Madison preferred the more stable republican Roman example, fearing to use the word "democracy," lest the people confuse the direct form with representative government.

Benjamin Franklin, famous for describing our form of government established as "a republic if you can keep it," is also the author of a quote defining democracy. Franklin's statement that "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch, while liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" correctly establishes the hazards of majority rule morphing into mob rule.

When a majority of citizens can pass laws which apply to all of the group's members, there must be in place a framework to judge whether such laws are reasonable and fair. This mechanism is necessary to shield an opposing minority from being wronged by intolerable, unfair and otherwise unlawful statutes. An uncompromising, self-righteous majority threatens liberty.

That vehicle is the separation of powers inherent in both the U.S. and Missouri constitutions. The deliberative bodies of the legislature, the executive and the judiciary are the safeguard against any branch of government being dominant and, in that function, bar a popular majority from the ability to oppress the minority. The ultimate power is in the hands of the people; however, experience and human nature have taught the necessity of alternate controls.

I won't attempt to reiterate the pros and cons of Proposition B other than to point out that the voter initiatives, referendums and recalls are a "direct democracy" procedure, almost always the promotion of special interests often accompanied by deep pockets. Accordingly, there is a danger that emotion, low voter turnout or big money will result in an inordinately flawed statute becoming law.

As passed, Proposition B's obvious flaws, that of ignoring the unlicensed and illegal breeders and over regulating the legitimate ones, properly places the ball in the legislature's court. Posing the question as one pitting animal lovers against the likes of greedy and abusive breeders makes for exciting and colorful rhetoric but ignores truth and common sense.

Additionally, in my opinion, the General Assembly had no other option but override of the 1999 failed ballot measure to authorize concealed carry of firearms — that initiative should not have gone to the voters. I can agree that a duly elected legislature may restrict some provisions of the Second Amendment, but neither my neighbors nor the voters of Kansas City and St. Louis are empowered by the Constitution to do so.

Our representative form of government protects the people from themselves.

J. Karl Miller retired as a colonel in the Marine Corps. He is a Columbia resident and can be reached via e-mail at

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Shelley Powers April 27, 2011 | 3:44 p.m.

Oh give it a break.

Missouri along with other states supports a concept called direct democracy through a thing typically known as a citizen initiative. The purpose for the citizen initiative is to give the people a last recourse, when the legislature is too corrupt or too heavily influenced by special interests.

Special interests like the Missouri Farm Bureau and the Cattlemen's Association.

You talk about deep pockets, yet it was the NRA that pushed the legislature to override the conceal carry law. So NRA deep pockets are good, but HSUS deep pockets aren't?

Where we differ from other states, is many of those who support a citizen initiative also have provisions in place to ensure legislators don't have a chance to muck with the newly passed bill until after a period of time has passed.

Because after all, the reason the people took to the streets for a vote is because the legislature wouldn't act. And all the Missouri General Assembly has shown is disdain for the voters, as they continued sucking up to agribusiness.

(Report Comment)
Shelley Powers April 27, 2011 | 3:45 p.m.

And excuse me but I'm an a bloody adult -- I don't need some idiot representative telling me how I may, or may not vote!

(Report Comment)
Terry Ward April 27, 2011 | 4:43 p.m.

The overriding " historical context" is that Missouri has been a haven for Troglodyte dog breeders since the discovery of Pluto.

And Kim Jong-il's form of government also "protects the people from themselves".

And now, according to Missouri's rocket scientists, the USA is not a democracy.


Where DO they breed these folks?

(Report Comment)
Tony Robertson April 27, 2011 | 6:13 p.m.

We ARE a republic. A government of laws, not of men. That is a fact, Terry. Where DO they breed folks who think otherwise?

Comparison of our form of govt to Kim Jong-Il? Jeez, try not to pull a muscle with a stretch like that. And read some books on the regime of Kim "I'm So Ronery" Jong Il. Get a grip on a thing called "perspective."

A pure democracy is two wolves and a sheep arguing over what's for supper. A republic is two wolves and a well-armed sheep arguing over what's for supper. A pure democracy can end up being 51% of the people peeing in the Cheerios of the other 49%.

Hope this helps expand your understanding of our representative form of government.

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire April 27, 2011 | 6:15 p.m.

You might try to cut and paste the article, but then again I can't really respect someone who bases an argument on an article that happens to be an opinion column. Facts tend to disappear fairly rapidly when you base your opinion on somebody's opinion... like so many people on here seem to do.

I tend to believe that many of the people who write those opinions know exactly how many holes are in their logic.

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire April 27, 2011 | 6:20 p.m.

Glitch unabated!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This comment was for a comment on another article and got posted here instead.

(Report Comment)
Shelley Powers April 28, 2011 | 10:56 a.m.

Send Paul to Iraq!

(Report Comment)
kathie blomberg May 1, 2011 | 4:24 p.m.

Here are some facts for ya--YOU LOST-WE WON. Get HSUS out of Missouri.

(Report Comment)
Terry Ward May 2, 2011 | 6:00 p.m.

Win or lose, breeders are thugs.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.