UPDATE: Gov. Nixon signs bill repealing dog-breeding restrictions

Wednesday, April 27, 2011 | 9:29 p.m. CDT; updated 11:12 p.m. CDT, Wednesday, April 27, 2011

JEFFERSON CITY — Gov. Jay Nixon has signed into law new legislation rewriting a voter-approved law on dog-breeding operations.

Nixon signed the measure Wednesday evening. It capped a flurry of activity that started earlier Wednesday when Nixon signed a previously passed bill repealing key sections of the "Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act" approved by voters last November.


Related Media

As part of a compromise among state-based agriculture and animal welfare groups, lawmakers quickly agreed to supersede their original bill with additional changes to the dog-breeding law.

Ultimately, it means a voter-approved limit of 50 breeding dogs per business will be repealed, and many of the original dog-care provisions will be replaced. The latest version of the bill also gives existing dog breeders more time to comply with expanded housing requirements.

Nixon signed the bill Wednesday that repeals restrictions put in place in November by a voter-passed dog-breeding measure.

Nixon notified the Senate that he signed the original legislation to undo Proposition B on Wednesday morning after months of heated debate and protests filled the Missouri Capitol. Nixon backed the finalized bill on April 18 after asking for input from several in-state organizations, including the Humane Society of Missouri and state Department of Agriculture.

"Our organizations here are strong, robust, have been great partners with the Department of Agriculture. ... " Nixon said. "The bottom line is we don't have to look to other places to get leadership on this issue. We have strength inside the organizations that are involved here. I don't need somebody jetting in to tell us what to do when we can do it ourselves."

Barbara Schmitz, Missouri state director of the Humane Society of the United States, which financed and spearheaded the campaign for voter approval, said she disapproves of the new legislation. She said the law puts the welfare of dogs in jeopardy.

"Senate Bill 113 took away all those core provisions and protections for the dogs and leaves us pretty much back where we were before ... " Schmitz said. "We think that is is really a slap in the face of voters."

Schmitz said the U.S. Humane Society is looking into different legal options and will continue their fight to uphold Proposition B as passed by voters.

"We are committed to seeing it protected," Schmitz said. "We are really, really disappointed in the political process that has failed us thus far."

The new law alters many of the major provisions put on dog breeders that were mandated and approved by 51.6 percent of voters last November. The sponsor of one of the bills, Sen. Mike Parson, R-Bolivar, said he is glad his bill has finally become law.

"That was something that we had worked on for a long time and worked very hard at," Parson said. "We were grateful to see him sign that."

Nixon held a news conference on Wednesday night to sign his own bill, which followed a full day of his office refusing to comment or even acknowledge his action on the first bill.

The compromise written by Nixon's administration was effective immediately upon the governor's signature.

Other changes to other voter-approved provisions including:

  • the requirement for outdoor exercise.
  • the mandate on how often a dog can be bred.
  • specific square footage requirements for cages.

Instead, the law requires breeders to use regulations to be set by the Missouri Department of Agriculture.

The law also:

  • allows for civil penalties and misdemeanor charges for repeat offenses.
  • applies a $25 annual fee to support law enforcement efforts.
  • allows licensing costs of up to $2,500 instead of $500.

State Sen. Robin Wright-Jones, D-St. Louis, said she disagrees with the changes.

"The voter's voice is why we go to the polls and to turn that over at anytime, to me, is a reckless thing to do," said Wright-Jones, whose district approved Proposition B by 76 percent.

Nixon, however, said he credits Missouri voters with prompting the debate on dog-breeding conditions.

"But for the people of the state voting on this, we wouldn't be here today," Nixon said. "Their votes did matter, their votes fundamentally changed a discussion that was going on in the state and played a vital role in getting this to the finish line."

State Rep. Margo McNeil, D-Florissant, said she is conflicted on whether the democratic process prevailed.

"I stuck with my voters who did not want to see Proposition B overturned," McNeil said. "They went to the polls, they voted, they won and they shouldn't have to take less than what they got. ... The winner shouldn't have to compromise."

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Shelley Powers April 27, 2011 | 9:49 p.m.

It is a slap in the face of the voters. I appreciate those who did stick by those of us who voted for Proposition B. A couple of people also tried their best to demonstrate how seriously wrong using the emergency clause was, too.

I do know I'll never vote for Nixon again. He played political games with this and I have no time to waste on career politicians who don't care about all of the people--not just the agribusiness community.

(Report Comment)
Tony Robertson April 27, 2011 | 11:43 p.m.

Well, not all the voters. Arguably, to a slim majority statewide, and to minorities in many of the counties of the state.

But why let facts get in the way of pure democracy. (See here:

(Report Comment)
Ricky Gurley April 28, 2011 | 5:17 a.m.

Ohhh; cry me a river!

Ricky Gurley.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith April 28, 2011 | 6:00 a.m.

Hey, Ricky, no crying of rivers! Don't we have enough flooding as it is? :)

(Report Comment)
kathie blomberg May 1, 2011 | 10:18 a.m.

Geez-Shelly P.Get a life-get a boyfriend-get a grip-do something besides whine.YOU LOST - WE WON.

(Report Comment)
Kate Becks May 2, 2011 | 1:50 p.m.

The bottom line for ALL Missourians who vote (regardless of your stance on this particular issue) is this: your vote does not matter here. If it is not the will of the people holding the purse strings or the powers that be, it will be ignored. The people opposed to Prop B should be incensed that the vote got overturned. Because it was the WILL OF THE PEOPLE! Perhaps they'll care more next time when it is their vote that doesn't count. And believe me, there will be a next time. Democracy is a farce here.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.