Gov. Jay Nixon vetoes Missouri photo ID, early voting bill

Friday, June 17, 2011 | 4:00 p.m. CDT; updated 12:15 p.m. CDT, Sunday, July 24, 2011

JEFFERSON CITY — Gov. Jay Nixon vetoed legislation Friday that could have required voters to show photo identification and created an early-voting period in Missouri.

Nixon said he spiked the bill because it could have made voting harder for seniors and the disabled, whom Nixon said are less likely to have a driver's license or other government-issued photo ID card.

"It is unacceptable to impede or discourage citizens from voting who have lawfully cast ballots their entire adult lives," Nixon said in a veto message to lawmakers.

A proposed constitutional amendment on photo IDs and early voting is still set to appear on Missouri's 2012 ballot. But that measure only authorizes the separate enactment of state laws on the two topics; it does not require them.

Nixon had supported the early voting provision. But Missouri governors can only use a line-item veto on budget bills, meaning Nixon had to either accept both the early voting and photo ID provisions or reject the entire bill.

Republicans generally have backed the photo ID requirement while Democrats generally have supported the early voting period. Republican legislative leaders linked the two provisions this year in an effort to avoid a Senate filibuster and garner more support for the measure.

Nixon's veto is the second recent rejection of photo identification legislation in Missouri. In 2006, the state Supreme Court struck down a photo identification law signed by then-Gov. Matt Blunt, a Republican. The court ruled that the law infringed on the fundamental right to vote granted by the Missouri Constitution, taking particular issue with the cost of obtaining documents — such as a birth certificate or passport — needed to obtain a free state photo ID card.

Lawmakers this year referred the proposed constitutional amendment to the 2012 ballot in an attempt to get around the court's concerns.

Ultimately, Nixon's veto may not prohibit a photo ID requirement. Legislators could pass another version of the bill in future years. Or, if voters approve the constitutional amendment, state and local officials could attempt to enforce the 2006 law on the basis that the state Supreme Court's prior ruling was essentially overturned.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Kathleen Weinschenk June 17, 2011 | 8:36 p.m.

Thank you, Governor Nixon ! Today you allowed freedom to ring and 200,000 people can keep their voices. This thing keeps coming up and we have to defeat it each time.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.