advertisement

Missouri jury rules for hog farm owner in odor lawsuit

Thursday, June 23, 2011 | 5:12 p.m. CDT

KANSAS CITY — Weeks after a jury ordered a hog farm to pay a dozen Missouri residents $2 million because of its foul smell, another jury rejected the claims in a similar case.

Vernon Hanes had sought $3 million, saying odors from a Premium Standard Farms hog farm in Daviess County damaged his use and enjoyment of his Daviess County property in northwest Missouri. But a jury in DeKalb County, where the case was moved, voted 9-3 Wednesday in favor of Premium Standard Farms.

The verdict followed a May decision by a southwest Missouri jury awarding $2 million to about a dozen plaintiffs who claimed odors from a nearby hog farm owned by Iowa-based Synergy had ruined their way of life.

It also came about a month after Gov. Jay Nixon signed into law a measure limiting how much money people can win in certain lawsuits against farms and livestock producers. The law also aims to prevent neighbors from filing repeated nuisance claims for the same problems on the same farm.

The legislation limits compensatory damages to the amount of rent owners of neighboring properties would lose because of a "temporary nuisance" created by a farm or the amount by which the property's fair market value would drop if a "permanent nuisance" exited. It also requires that subsequent nuisance lawsuits involving the same properties and problems be treated as "permanent nuisance" claims in court.

Premium Standard Farms said last year that it might be forced to leave the state if it continued to be targeted by nuisance lawsuits that have already resulted in multiple multimillion-dollar awards against the company. In one case, a jury awarded $11 million to a group of 15 northwest Missouri residents.

Jean Paul Bradshaw, a lawyer for Premium Standard Farms, said the DeKalb County verdict was a victory for the company, which still has about a dozen other lawsuits pending against it.

"Every case is different, but much of the evidence is the same," Bradshaw said Thursday. "It does bode well. It shows that ... we've made some significant improvements."

Bradshaw said Premium Standard Farms has taken steps to cut down on odors at its sites. The Princeton-based company has about 97,000 sows that will produce about 1.8 million market hogs throughout its locations in six Missouri counties.

Charlie Speer, Hanes' lawyer, said Thursday he was disappointed with the DeKalb County verdict, but he remained confident in other cases he has pending against the company.

"These cases just come down to the facts of the individual plaintiffs," he said. "The jury just felt like his use and enjoyment had not been substantially impaired."

Speer also said he planned to challenge Missouri's new farm lawsuit legislation, which he said takes away one's "right to breathe fresh air."

"We think it has a good chance of getting overturned," he said.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Harold Sutton June 23, 2011 | 7:05 p.m.

I grew up on a farm. We raised a few hogs. They were free range and not confinement. Meaning the hogs had several acres of fenced in area. No smell.

If nowadays I happen to drive near a confinement farm when the wind comes my way, I get bad headaches and asthma. Same with any of the other confinement operations - turkey, chicken, cattle.

So how did this Country, and other countries, make do before huge confinement operations???????

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire June 23, 2011 | 7:15 p.m.

I've got to say the verdict really stinks.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements