Downtown businesses petition City Council concerning Summerfest street closure

Thursday, June 23, 2011 | 7:56 p.m. CDT

COLUMBIA — A petition from downtown business owners asking that the Columbia City Council only approve street closures for Ninth Street Summerfest concerts under certain conditions is causing some buzz downtown.

Summerfests have been held occasionally over the past eight years and are sponsored by The Blue Note and its owner, Richard King. Representatives of 21 downtown businesses signed a petition saying that though the events generally are good for the district, they sometimes draw customers away from competing businesses.


Related Media

Related Articles

The petition originally listed 21 downtown bars and restaurants, but one reversed its position on Wednesday. Room 38 stated in a Facebook post that it no longer wanted to back the petition.

"We agreed to sign the petition originally because the section of requests regarding Summerfest adhering to midweek shows seemed reasonable. After further discussion with Richard personally, we've chosen to decline any further participation in the matter as the majority of the petition was never a concern for us in the first place," the post said.

A copy of the petition was posted on The Blue Note's Facebook page on Friday, the same day it was e-mailed to King.

"I don't see any merit in the petition," King said Thursday. "It doesn't make any sense to me."

The petition was delivered to the council before its Monday meeting. It asked that council members approve Summerfest events only if they are to be held on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday nights and to prohibit any concerts that would require street closures to occur after MU classes start.

The petitioners argued that Summerfest is a boon to downtown primarily when it happens during slow business days.

Third Ward Councilman Gary Kespohl said the council will examine the petitioners' concerns.

He said King has gained an advantage on the market because of his creative business practices.

One other downtown businesses that signed the petition has used social media to clarify its position.

Shakespeare's Pizza manager Kurt Mirtsching said the purpose of the Monday night Facebook post was to present all sides. The post tried to clarify that that it doesn't oppose Summerfests or The Blue Note.

"The real issue is how often and why a private, for-profit business uses public property for private gain," the post stated. "... This petition is part of the process of working out a fair response to a good problem: how to manage a vibrant, exciting, living, growing downtown, in a way that is a equitable as it can be."

Mirtsching said Shakespeare's has no plans to change its position.

"Summerfest adds a lot of charm, culture and positive things to the city," he said. "It has elements people are in favor of, it has elements people are opposed to. An open dialogue will lay all the cards on the table, and City Council can ultimately decide what's best for downtown Columbia."

Mirtsching added that the petition promotes conversation about the competitive nature of owning a business in downtown Columbia.

"We'd like to be the only bar or restaurant in town, but there are going to be others. Summerfest is just one more,"Mirtsching said.

King said he was not included in any discussion about the petitioning businesses' concerns.

The petition lists Julie Rader, owner of Bengal's Bar and Grill, and Tom Atkinson, owner of Shiloh Bar and Grill, as contacts.

Rader declined to comment on the record about the petition. Atkinson failed to return multiple phone calls about it.

Rader also opposed a request by Harpo's last year to close a section of Cherry Street after MU home football games, according to minutes of an Aug. 2, 2010, meeting of the council. She argued that the council should reserve street closures for special events intended to draw people downtown at times when they might not otherwise visit the business district. That stance is consistent with the one presented in the recent petition.

The council rejected Harpo's request. Some members said roping off an area for bar patrons wasn't a cultural event. Others said it would lead to a barrage of requests for other businesses to close streets for partiers.

Harpo's owners were not among those who signed the recent petition.

The Downtown Community Improvement District Board of Directors has taken no position on the issue. Its next meeting is July 12.

King said that when he organizes the Summerfests, he has little control over the days and dates artists will come.

"I don't tell them how it works. They tell me," he said.

King added that he often is competing with other venues in St. Louis, Kansas City or other cities.

The council at its May 2 meeting approved King's request to close a section of Ninth Street for Summerfests on June 9 and June 24 and another event on July 14.

The June 9 Summerfest featured Toots and the Maytals as headliners. The concert series continues Friday with Big Bad Voodoo Daddy. Gates will open at 6 p.m.

The July 14 event is not associated with Summerfest. The ticketed outdoor concert will feature Darius Rucker.

King said he has considered relocating Summerfest to prevent street closures.

"I'm always exploring my options," he said.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Joe Smith June 23, 2011 | 9:39 p.m.

This is not just Mr. King doing "businesses as usual" or the petitioners asking for the government to intervene in normal competition. And this is not the same as the True/False street closures, the soap box derby, parades, etc (all closures by non-profits). The current street closure ordinance does allow a for-profit business to close the streets, BUT only with Council approval. The spirit of the ordinance is to accommodate special events downtown that make The District better for everyone. It's supposed to be a fun, generous thing. And it's at the Council's discretion. I think many Council members will agree that when it comes to multiple large street closures by the same individual over and over again, it only stands to reason that there should be just A FEW limitations on that person using the public streets when we have 21 of your most prominent downtown businesses saying certain of these closures are actually bad for many of them downtown (or just plain unfair).

(Report Comment)
Joe Smith June 23, 2011 | 9:42 p.m.

People are correct when they say these businesses should be willing to take a sales hit from time to time for fun events that make downtown so lively. They state clearly that they agree...That's why they have no problem with Sundays, Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays in the summer months. They'll take it those days. But since Mr. King must ask the Council for the right to use shared, public resources for all of these events (aka the streets), it's only logical that the Council should take a closer look at what's really going on before approving every event without second thought.

(Report Comment)
terry bura June 24, 2011 | 8:16 a.m.

Supporting the Blue Note in the summer activities my right as a tax payer. The business bothered by this event need to suck it up, camp out in there new parking garage and watch the summerfest. For reference to me and others it would be nice to know the business that want control over the Blue note.....

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire June 25, 2011 | 9:50 a.m.

I fail to see how a business that is several blocks away from the Blue Note is negatively impacted in any way by the closure of one very short block of street traffic.

Can we please be a little pettier in our whining? I don't think everyone is jealous enough. I'm sorry that none of the thousands of people who congregated in your downtown business district thought to stop in to your sorry establishments.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams June 25, 2011 | 11:12 a.m.

The article says, "The real issue is how often and why a private, for-profit business uses public property for private gain..."

Which is why the city council and taxpayers have a legitimate dog in this "fight".

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire June 25, 2011 | 3:12 p.m.

"The article says, "The real issue is...""

No, Mike. The article said that a post by someone from Shakespeare's Pizza said...

Shakespeare's Pizza manager Kurt Mirtsching said the purpose of the Monday night Facebook post was to present all sides. "The real issue is how often and why a private, for-profit business uses public property for private gain," the post stated. "

This is probably a bad day for you. Maybe next week will be better. At this point I almost expect you to say "Fox news said..."

Oh wait. You DID say that!

I mean, seriously. On a matter of OPINION, why should I care what the article, Shakespeare's, or Kurt Mirtsching said? And don't try to tell me that what the actual issue is is not a matter of opinion.

If this were left up to the taxpaying citizens, what do you think they would tell those people to do with their petition?

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams June 25, 2011 | 5:25 p.m.

Most taxpaying citizens would say, "Try not to close down streets too often. Every once-in-a-while is ok."

Those who are supported by all other taxpayers probably don't care a whit one way or the other.

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire June 26, 2011 | 2:16 p.m.

Right Mike, because going from Broadway to Ash is really a long distance and it's important that you do that on Ninth Street and not on Eighth Street or Tenth Street or any other surrounding block. I know this delayed a lot of trucks that were passing through from St. Louis on their way to Kansas City. And you were correct in knowing that while there weren't any ticket sales the people standing behind the barricades were turning back anybody if they looked like they had paid some taxes. The events are for non tax payers only. I don't know why they didn't make that clearer in the advertisements.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.