PETA-financed pork scientist raises hackles at MU

Sunday, July 24, 2011 | 3:41 p.m. CDT; updated 9:38 a.m. CDT, Monday, July 25, 2011

COLUMBIA — Some Missouri farm groups are crying foul over the recent hiring of an MU scientist whose research is paid for by animal rights activists.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that Nicholas Genovese joined the university's flagship campus in Columbia as a visiting scholar earlier this month. His research involves artificial meat created in laboratories from animal tissues.

Genovese previously worked at the Medical University of South Carolina but left when his mentor took a job in South America. At MU, he is paid through a three-year grant from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

"This is the wave of the future," said PETA president Ingrid Newkirk. "People who are environmentally aware are keen on this; animal rights advocates are keen on this;  health advocates are keen on this. The only people who aren't keen are in a business that this will affect."

That includes members of the Missouri Farm Bureau, the state's most powerful agricultural lobbying group.

"Let me tell you," said Blake Hurst, the bureau's president. "My farmer friends are exercised."

R. Michael Roberts, a prominent university biologist and stem cell researcher who is supervising Genovese, emphasized that the scientist is not a university employee. Genovese declined comment.

He's essentially a private citizen who chose to work with me," Roberts said. "I'm getting a well-trained young scientist to work in an area that interests me."

Roberts hopes that Genovese's research will help the lab create cultured tissue for human and livestock medical research.

Roberts' recent work has focused on the transformation of animal cells into embryonic stem cells. Two years ago, his research team used pigs' connective tissue to create "induced" stem cells that act like embryonic cells and can potentially be converted into tissue cells without using actual embryos.

"I'm interested in these cells to get them to differentiate toward muscles," Roberts said. "That's the primary component of most meat."

Roberts said that Genovese sought him out several months ago after his mentor, Vladimir Mironov, moved to Brazil to work for a large meat company. He is known for his efforts to grow in vitro meat from animal stem cells.

Newkirk said the artificial meat research — which has yet to be proven commercially viable — "has put the wind up the skirts of these farmers who are getting all panicky and apparently haven't been following trends in eating."


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Mark Foecking July 24, 2011 | 5:06 p.m.

I've done a lot of mammalian tissue culture in my career, and from an energy/resources standpoint, couldn't imagine it to be a viable meat source except for the very rich.

Most media that support mammalian cell growth contain animal serum, and while there are media that don't require it (e. g. CMRL-1066, Google is your friend), typically cells don't do as well in it as they do with serum supplements. It also takes a lot of technology/resources to make CMRL-1066, including animal-based ones.

The nutritive value of the medium far exceeds any product that might grow from it. It would be far more efficient just to drink the medium.

Ingrid Newkirk is a whackjob, and it's unfortunate she has captured the minds and money of wealthy celebrities. I wish Dr. Genovese success, and hope his research yields alternatives for, e. g. people needing organ replacements. But I wouldn't count on cultured meat to be economic compared to farm raised or wild caught meat.


(Report Comment)
Michael Williams July 24, 2011 | 5:25 p.m.

MarkF: Maybe he's gonna use CMRL-1066 as a steak marinade?

Italian salad dressing is cheaper, tho.

People Eating Tasty Animals

(Report Comment)
Robin Wilcox July 25, 2011 | 8:17 a.m.

"Newkirk said the artificial meat research — which has yet to be proven commercially viable — "has put the wind up the skirts of these farmers who are getting all panicky and apparently haven't been following trends in eating.""

When did eating Frankenmeat become a trend? I thought more people were moving toward less processed, more organic, non-GMO foods. Will Ingrid Newkirk eat cultured meat? I raise sheep, chickens and turkeys. My husband hunts venison. We purchase very little meat. If I could raise fish, I wouldn't purchase meat at all.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.