COMMENTARY: Rupert Murdoch committed crimes and called it 'freedom of the press'

Wednesday, August 3, 2011 | 7:23 p.m. CDT

Rupert Murdoch, the Australia-born media tycoon, finally got his you-know-what caught in the wringer.

Murdoch's unethical newspapers hacked thousands of private phone messages, including those of actors Hugh Grant and Jude Law, as well as Prince William and Prince Harry.

The scandal might even involve Queen Elizabeth II, as there are allegations that Murdoch's reporters paid her bodyguards for information that wasn't supposed to be released to the media or the public. The intimate lives of murder victims, their families and the relatives of dead soldiers also became hacking fodder.

In Murdoch's tabloids, such as The Sun in the U.K. and the New York Post on this side of the pond, stories on poverty, unemployment and foreclosures get dwarfed by reports of Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears making X-rated videos before going into rehab.

Murdoch discovered that Protestant England's repressive sexual culture, exported to its former colonies in the United States of America, makes for great markets for selling sex as a news commodity.

His properties also include more sober titles like The Wall Street Journal, the most widely circulated U.S. newspaper. Until Murdoch bought it in 2007 by acquiring Dow Jones & Co., the Journal's news coverage was generally pro-business but free from the rabidly right-wing bias of the newspaper's editorial pages. That distinction, however, has since faded.

Behind Murdoch's propaganda machine lies a drab political and economic imperative bent on destroying any form of regulation on capital.

In this country, for example, commentators on his Fox News Channel spew verbal venom on proposals Murdoch opposes, such as taxing billionaires and regulating corporations and banks.

They imply that the government will always squander taxpayers' money. Really? Just imagine life without cops, firemen, schools or traffic lights.

To achieve that end and expand his $47 billion News Corp. publishing and broadcasting empire, Murdoch intimidated the powerful. The subservient players in his game of politics have given the unelected media baron dominant sway over public discourse.

In the United States, Murdoch's Fox News perpetuated the fiction that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and had ties to al-Qaida. He didn't, but the media tycoon never atoned for that journalistic sin.

Recently, several members of Congress have asked authorities to investigate if News of the World, a Murdoch newspaper that ceased publication in July after advertisers pulled their support for it, also hacked into the voice mails of relatives of 9/11 victims.

In a letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Pete King, R-N.Y., said journalists should face felony charges if evidence is found.

Reporters have begun to ask the Watergate questions about the 80-year-old Murdoch. What did he know, and when did he know it? That's beside the point.

He created the perfect atmosphere for criminal activities and called it "freedom of the press." Buying political influence and extorting protection from the cops aren't acceptable ways to exercise that right.

Murdoch has more to worry about than the damage his employees' methods have done to people's lives, his undermining of the public trust or his manipulation of popular taste from the banal to the gross. Namely, he now faces the real possibility that this indignity will cost him a $12.5 billion deal with British Sky Satellite, the highly profitable satellite TV enterprise.

Murdoch already owns 39 percent of the company, which has 10 million subscribers and is managed by his son James Murdoch. Until recently, he anticipated adding the remaining 61 percent stake to his media empire.

After years of being pushed out of sight, Murdoch's transgressions began to have consequences this summer when the public learned that News of the World journalists likely manipulated voice mails from 13-year-old Milly Dowler's phone, leading to gripping headlines about the missing girl.

English parents grew enraged after learning voice mails were intercepted and deleted from the girl's device. That kept the teen's family hopeful she was still alive and delayed the real news of her 2002 abduction and murder.

Their outrage has leveled a major blow on Murdoch's smarmy empire, five years after British authorities first began to investigate reports of illegal phone hacking.

Journalists might also want to investigate Murdoch for attempted murder — of their profession.

Saul Landau is a fellow with the Institute for Policy Studies.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.