advertisement

ANALYSIS: Missouri could consider property tax changes to aid Joplin

Sunday, August 7, 2011 | 3:51 p.m. CDT

JEFFERSON CITY — Businesses destroyed by a deadly tornado in Joplin remain on property tax rolls as if their buildings were standing and their cash registers were ringing. A southwestern Missouri lawmaker is hoping some property tax relief could be considered for firms that are unable to bring in revenue because of the damage from the powerful storm.

At issue is how Missouri handles property taxes. In many counties, Jan. 1, is the key date for determining the value of property and the ability to tax it. Some counties have adopted ordinances, however, that allow new residential properties to be added to the tax rolls when they are occupied in the middle of the year and that permit homes to be removed from tax rolls when destroyed by natural disasters and therefore made uninhabitable. The property tax polices affect residential property and not businesses.

In other words, the owner of a house that cannot be occupied mid-year because it has been so badly damaged would pay property tax for the land over the entire year but would not owe property taxes on the structure after it was destroyed.

The distinction between homes and business has gotten attention because Jasper County, which is home to Joplin, has adopted the ordinance that allows uninhabitable residences to be removed from the tax roll.

A tornado that struck May 22 killed 160 people and damaged or destroyed about 8,000 homes and businesses in the Joplin area. The powerful tornado cut a path several miles long and struck residential neighborhoods and many businesses in the southwestern Missouri city.

State Rep. Bill White said several people who owned commercial property in Joplin have told him that the property tax situation has added to their financial hardship because the tax is owed for damaged or destroyed buildings that are not generating revenue right now. White, R-Joplin, said it makes sense for businesses to be eligible for treatment similar to that for residential property.

"It seems very unfair to the businesses," he said.

The vice chairman of a state House committee created to examine recent natural disasters, White said, if there is time, he would like lawmakers to consider property tax policies in a special session rather than waiting until next year because it would allow changes to help with the recovery in Joplin rather than serving as an option for the future. But White said he was not sure whether or not there would be enough time to address property taxes.

Gov. Jay Nixon has called a special legislative session in September that is to include an economic development package, a delay to the state's presidential primary and disaster recovery.

This year, the state has faced flooding along the Mississippi and Missouri rivers and tornadoes in Joplin, St. Louis and Sedalia. Part of the discussion on disaster recovery has involved whether or not to use Missouri's rainy day fund to help cover some of the recovery costs.

Allowing destroyed Joplin businesses to be removed from the tax rolls might offer a financial reprieve to some commercial property owners, but it also could reduce some of the revenue collected by local governments.

Overall, however, the property tax policy can cut both ways for the governmental bodies that depend on revenue from property taxes. An attorney for the state Tax Commission said many local governments have liked the occupancy polices because it means they can get tax revenue quicker in good economic times when the population is growing and new homes are being built.

State tax records show that 46 counties have adopted property tax policies that allow residences to be added to property tax rolls when they are occupied and to be removed when structures are destroyed. Those are scattered across the state and include many of the most populated areas, including St. Louis, St. Charles, Jackson and Greene counties. Small, rural counties have joined in too, including Schuyler County in northeastern Missouri on the Iowa border, DeKalb County in northwestern Missouri and Dunklin County along the Arkansas border in the Bootheel.

Although many other rural counties have not adopted the property tax ordinances, several more densely populated counties have not either. Boone County that is home to Columbia has not. And neither have Platte County near Kansas City, Buchanan County that is home to St. Joseph and St. Louis city.

Among those that could get some relief from changes in how property taxes are handled is Jeff Majzoub, who is a co-owner for Yorktown Properties, which lost two office buildings and three retail strip centers because of the tornado in Joplin. He said some property tax changes could help free some money for reconstruction.

"If they would give us a break, they could add them back to the tax rolls when they get back in service," Majzoub said.

 Chris Blank has covered state government and politics for The Associated Press since 2005.

 


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Ray Shapiro August 8, 2011 | 11:30 a.m.

Would this mean that National Companies like WalMart and Home Depot would also be exempt from property taxes or just small business owners who have no other significant source of income?
Seems to me that this might be a good time for Columbia's Residential and Commercial Realty Brokers, our Chamber of Commerce, our school board and our new City Manager liaison with representatives of the Joplin Community and have them take a look at what relocating to Columbia might offer.

(Report Comment)
Jimmy Bearfield August 8, 2011 | 12:28 p.m.

"Seems to me that this might be a good time for Columbia's Residential and Commercial Realty Brokers, our Chamber of Commerce, our school board and our new City Manager liaison with representatives of the Joplin Community and have them take a look at what relocating to Columbia might offer."

I can see the Post-Dispatch editorial now: "Columbia Poaches Joplin Businesses in Storm's Aftermath." Or the Joplin Globe: "Columbia Kicks Us When We're Down." Such a move would absolutely guarantee that the SW MO members of the legislature would look to punish MU and this region for generations.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith August 8, 2011 | 1:27 p.m.

"Such a move would absolutely guarantee that the SW MO members of the legislature would look to punish MU and this region for generations."

Possibly, but one doubts they really require additional incentives. :)

(Report Comment)
Jimmy Bearfield August 8, 2011 | 1:46 p.m.

"Possibly, but one doubts they really require additional incentives. :)"

True dat. It would be one more reason, albeit a big, fat one.

(Report Comment)
Ray Shapiro August 8, 2011 | 2:01 p.m.

Politics aside, the quality of life for a homeless, displaced or shell-shocked Joplin resident or family relocating to Columbia has got to be better than temporarily living in a FEMA trailer or homeless shelter.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements