advertisement

Legislators call for termination of SynCare's contract with state

Wednesday, August 31, 2011 | 7:37 p.m. CDT; updated 10:34 a.m. CDT, Wednesday, September 28, 2011

JEFFERSON CITY — Budget Committee members questioned state health department officials about their continued relationship with a private contractor that failed to fulfill the terms of their $11.4 million contract.

SynCare LLC was hired to provide support and assessment of care plans, but wasn't able to handle the sheer volume of calls, said Peter Lyskowski, deputy director of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. Lyskowski told the committee that his department hesitates to terminate the contract for fear it would result in further delays in patient care, adding that the procedure to terminate a contract typically takes 90 days.

More than 50,000 Missourians using home and community-based services have experienced a lapse in service since SynCare began working in May. Clients have been on hold for extended periods of time and waited more than the allotted 15 days to receive their plan, which delays care. Lyskowski said his department has heard of some people being forced into nursing homes because of poor service.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported that SynCare laid off 29 employees and began to miss payroll, further delaying services. Before the first quarter of its contract had passed, 33 state employees were needed to help SynCare deal with patient calls.

"How long can we expect SynCare to bleed the way they're bleeding and continue to perform," said Rep. Randy Asbury, R-Higbee.

A provision in the contract fines SynCare $5,000 for every month they do not fulfill the contract and only allows them to bill the state for 50 percent of their work.

"I'm concerned with not what we're gonna do in the next 30, 60, 90 days but what we're gonna do now," said Rep. Jeff Grisamore, R-Lee's Summit. Lyskowski said improvements were being approached on a day-to-day basis and there is no long-term plan.

Lyskowski argued for continuing the contract until service improves. 

"We want to make sure that whatever happens there isn't some vacuum or void where services are not delivered," Lyskowski said.

"It would seem that the missteps in the last few months have created a void and it's a crisis," Grisamore said.

When the contract was announced in 2010, there were 11 initial offers. None of the companies had prior experience in this kind of consulting. Renee Slusher from the state's Office of Administration said the contract was awarded to the best, most responsible and lowest bidder and that there were no red flags when evaluating SynCare.

"I think generally we understood that there was a risk because none of these were proven performers," Slusher said. She said the decision-making process consisted of assigning points to attributes of each company and weighing the costs of their methods.

Rep. Ryan Silvey, R-Kansas City and chairman of the House Budget Committee, read aloud from the comments on SynCare's evaluation from the Office of Administration. Concerns included the fragmented nature of providing service, poor ratio of supervisors to staff, lack of detail in their execution model and no back-up plan. The document also cited "concern with the plan with oversight to ensure satisfactory performance."

"I think the department has failed here miserably," Rep. Dave Schatz, R-Sullivan, said.

No representative from SynCare was present at the hearing, and administrators weren't available for comment.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

monty newberry August 31, 2011 | 9:31 p.m.

this young lady writes some very good articles well written
easy to understand thanks
mjn

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements