GUEST COMMENTARY: Woman fired for backing a union

Monday, September 12, 2011 | 11:13 a.m. CDT; updated 3:38 p.m. CDT, Monday, September 12, 2011

Last month, Target fired Tashawna Green — but not for being bad at her job. They fired her, she says, for trying to make her job better.

Green, a 21-year-old single mom, was the most public supporter of a campaign to unionize the workers at her Long Island, N.Y., store. Before an unsuccessful union vote, she told The New York Times and other media outlets about the challenge of supporting her daughter on $8 an hour and insufficient hours. Her photo appeared in several newspapers.

Target, which has more than 1,760 American stores, earned $704 million in profits in the second quarter. Like its big-box competitor Walmart, Target has zero union employees in the United States.

That means none of Target's workers may bargain collectively over wages or the company's refusal to schedule more workers for full-time hours. More than 50 of Costco's nearly 600 stores, in contrast, are unionized.

Target isn't claiming Green didn't show up to work or couldn't do the job. Instead, the company put out a statement saying she was fired for acting "in an overly hostile, disruptive manner."

Green and representatives of the United Food & Commercial Workers Union say that's just a tricky way of saying she wanted to join a union, and Target doesn't want its employees to have that option.

The UFCW is filing charges with the National Labor Relations Board, saying Target illegally punished her for engaging in activism.

It would be nice to say that what happened to Green is unusual or that going to the government means she'll get justice. But the truth is that companies fire workers for union activity all the time, and they often get away with it.

Research from the Economic Policy Institute shows that more than a third of companies respond to union elections by firing union activists. Other tactics that make workers fear losing their jobs are even more common, according to the institute.

Under the current law, companies dead-set on keeping out unions have a lot to gain by firing workers like Green. Firing union supporters removes them from the workplace and sends a chilling message to their co-workers.

Since none of us is perfect, it can be hard to prove to the government that union activism was the reason someone was fired — with appeals, the process can take years.

Even if a worker wins a case, usually the stiffest punishment a company faces is bringing the worker back to work, paying the wages she missed (minus any money earned at another job in the meantime) and posting a notice saying that it won't fire workers for union organizing in the future.

Unfortunately, that's a small price to pay for refusing to negotiate with your employees over their wages and benefits.

During the two years that Democrats held the presidency and both houses of Congress, it looked like the Employee Free Choice Act might pass. The bill would have tripled the damages for companies that fire workers for union activism, as well as given workers the option of winning union recognition just by signing up a majority of their co-workers.

This majority sign-up ("card check") solution, which is the main way workers have won the opportunity to join unions in recent years, sparked a debate over its fairness. But there wasn't enough discussion of the problem that inspired it.

Workers like Green, who speak up to improve their jobs, too often lose their jobs as a result.

Workers who step up to organize their workplaces are really whistle-blowers. They break a silence that can otherwise leave people thinking that the problems they're experiencing are theirs alone.

They create an avenue for addressing workplace issues that can otherwise hurt not only workers but also their consumers and communities.

These workplace whistle-blowers deserve the respect of our culture and the protections of our legal system.

Josh Eidelson is a freelance journalist and a former union organizer. He wrote this commentary for His website is

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Jimmy Bearfield September 13, 2011 | 12:06 p.m.

"Target, which has more than 1,760 American stores, earned $704 million in profits in the second quarter. Like its big-box competitor Walmart, Target has zero union employees in the United States."

How many of you pro-union folks have purged Walmart and Target from your 401(k), IRA, etc.?

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire September 13, 2011 | 1:50 p.m.

Your comments are always relevant. Or maybe not.

I'm not the largest supporter of unions, but I don't invest in either company and I generally don't shop in either store anymore.

(Report Comment)
Jimmy Bearfield September 13, 2011 | 2:13 p.m.

Good for you, Paul. You're the exception. Most people -- even those who claim to be pro-union -- don't look at a company's union stance when investing. I know this because 1) socially responsible investment funds are a tiny niche and 2) analyst reports, Motley Fool, et al never discuss a company's union situation except when they have one and a strike is a possibility. That's because they know most investors don't care.

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire September 13, 2011 | 2:31 p.m.

I know that many investment funds are diversified to the point to where it would be hard for an individual to have any significant impact on anything, and this is mainly to protect the investor from market anomalies. Funds also tend to change over time. There is probably a significant portion of ownership in many large companies that belongs to people who have no idea that they own such. It is even harder to make such a choice if your investment plan is provided through your place of employment. But I do encourage everyone to view their investments and to act when possible.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.