Oklahoma far superior in its 38-28 win over Missouri

Saturday, September 24, 2011 | 11:56 p.m. CDT; updated 12:28 a.m. CDT, Sunday, September 25, 2011
MU defensive coordinator Dave Steckel reacts during the second quarter of the game at Oklahoma on Saturday.

NORMAN, Okla. — The act was a simple one. As he finished a run to the left side, Oklahoma fullback Trey Millard met Missouri safety Matt White at the sideline. Millard could have just stepped out of bounds for a simple eight-yard gain on first down, and that would have been it.

But that wasn’t it.

Instead, Millard put his shoulder down and sent White violently to the turf, leaving the safety looking more like a receiver getting pummeled over the middle rather than a defensive player trying to make a stop.

It was all the 85,547 in attendance needed to see to figure out who was the better team in every way at Owen Field on Saturday night.

Either that, or they could have looked at the final score: Oklahoma 38, Missouri 28.

Tiger fans will argue about focusing on bright spots — and there were a couple. Henry Josey had 133 rushing yards; the Sooners only outgained Missouri 592-532 in total yards; and if it weren’t for those two Grant Ressel missed field goals, it would have been a much different game.

But make no mistake, this game was never really close. Even when Missouri led 14-3, it was clear that it was only a matter of time before the Oklahoma offense, which ran 87 plays in the game, found its rhythm.

The Tigers saw it for the first time late in the first quarter. Three Landry Jones completions in less than a minute came like the staccato beats of the snare drums in “The Pride of Oklahoma.” If you left to go to the bathroom, the Sooners were on the 50, and while you were away, they ran those three plays, scored a touchdown, kicked the extra point before you could even flush.

Deeper into the game, the undeniably quick-but-steady rhythm that the Sooners eventually found sucked the air out of the Missouri defense like an expensive Dyson, leaving defensive players either standing out-of-breath with their hands on their hips in between plays or frantically scrambling off the field for some temporary relief.

“Especially in the second quarter we got worn out,” coach Gary Pinkel said. “What happens is you get three or four plays, you get a big play in there, and you have a five play drive and you go 70 yards in two and a half minutes. It takes its toll.”

What the pace of the offense does is more than just wear a team out physically. That effect is obvious. It also allows momentum to swing so fast that a defense might forget they ever had it in the first place. All it takes is two successful plays back-to-back and the defense is instantly on the ropes, feeling like the Sooners have been driving for eight or nine plays instead of just two.

Until then, the Tigers had managed to interrupt the Sooners’ flow enough to stop it. They wouldn’t do it much after that.

It didn’t help that the Missouri offense struggled to stay on the field. It’s no secret that the more physical team makes the plays when it matters. The Tigers quite simply didn’t get it done on third down.

“We left them out there too long,” T.J. Moe said. “We had a lot of three and outs and a lot of times where we didn’t capitalize on our drives.”

Missouri tried what seemed like everything to keep its drives alive. Quarterback runs and handoffs came up short, while rhythm passes and long, downfield attempts fell harmlessly incomplete. They lined up in their standard spread, with five receivers and they lined up in the I-formation, something rarely, if ever, seen during the Pinkel era.

None of it mattered because none of it worked.

“It’s a good observation,” Pinkel said of the team’s third-down struggles.

In the end the Tigers were run over, just like White. Unlike last year’s game against Oklahoma, it was clear which team was ranked No. 1. And also unlike last year’s matchup against Oklahoma, that team will stay there.


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Brad Racino September 25, 2011 | 2:09 a.m.

This is a fantastic article. That is all.

(Report Comment)
Craig Bunger September 25, 2011 | 10:15 a.m.

A fullback laying out a defensive back really shows they were that much superior? They executed better than Mizzou, especially at the wide receiver position and Jones didn't make many mistakes after the first pick. We lost the game and didn't play our best, but to say the game was never close is pretty absurd. The Tribune is far superior to the Missourian and this article is a prime example why. I would put together a one sentence paragraph to back my point up further, but you seem to have the market cornered on that strategy.

(Report Comment)
Steven Sapp September 25, 2011 | 5:45 p.m.

Well Harry Plummer, looks like LSU is No. 1 in the AP polls this afternoon, so "clearly" Oklahoma didn't stay at the number one spot - and don't think the narrow margin of victory over Mizzou isn't one of the factors they are not #1 today.

Mizzou knocked Oklahoma out of first place last year with a defeat, and did it again this year with a loss at Norman.

I admired Matt White and the way he stepped up on that hit on Millard - a hit Mr. Plummer would have "stepped out of bounds" to avoid.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith September 26, 2011 | 8:44 a.m.

It's likely that unlike the rest of the nation there were few locals who watched the LSU-West Virginia football game on ABC-TV last Saturday night. Those who did watch have no problem understanding why LSU is now #1. That was an impressive on-the-road performance against a good football team and a hostile crowd. Give the LSU Tigers the credit they deserve!

BTW, college football does not revolve around one and only one conference. Besides, who knows what conference some teams will be in by next season? :)

ABC-TV's night game next Saturday will be Nebraska vs. Wisconsin. Nebraska's first Big 10 conference game.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.