House committee approves China hub bill

Wednesday, October 5, 2011 | 8:56 p.m. CDT

JEFFERSON CITY — The China cargo hub and tax break bill is back in action after a House committee approved an updated version of the legislation on Wednesday — but it was advanced to the House by a committee whose chair blocked members from offering amendments to the bill.

House Economic Development Committee chairwoman Anne Zerr, R-St. Charles, called for an immediate vote on the bill, blocking any discussion, amendments or debate by committee members. 

The committee heard hours of testimony on the Senate's version of the bill last week and spent several days making changes. The China hub bill, termed the Missouri Export Act as of Tuesday, limits multiple state tax credit programs while offering tax credits for developers to create an international trade hub in St. Louis.

Blocked from a committee vote was an amendment that would have imposed a seven-year termination, or sunset, on two of the state's largest tax credits for developers — historic preservation and low-income housing construction.

Senate leaders have said the bill will not survive if those sunsets are not included.

While not including the sunsets, the House committee version of the bill caps the amount of money the state can give out each year for some tax credits programs.

Zerr prevented Rep. Jamilah Nasheed, D-St. Louis, from offering an amendment intended to restore these sunsets;. Nasheed said that without the amendment, the bill is dead on arrival.

Nasheed promptly went to her car to drive back home to St. Louis, abandoning the special session.

"I had an amendment to offer, and that amendment was not allowed in committee," Nasheed said in telephone interview from her car. "And I felt like, you know, if we're going to run this government just like China then there's no need for me to be there."

"There will be no job creation this year," Nasheed said. 

Zerr originally said she would accept amendments, but she decided the committee would only address an amendment for a technical word change after consulting with committee members. 

"Nobody in leadership told me to do this. This was a decision based on what I thought after listening to people," Zerr said. "What I thought was the right thing to do and just give people time to look at this. Let's take it to the full floor; let's debate the full floor."

The bill passed the committee with a 21 to 4 vote. The bill will be open for debate in the chamber when the House meets Thursday.

Nasheed and some Senate leaders have said that other legislation addressed in the special session, such as a bill giving St. Louis local control of its police department, has been pushed aside in favor of the China hub proposal. Some, such as Nasheed, have decided they're done with the special session, which lawmakers had originally planned to conclude Sept. 23.

"I'm done with the circus," Nasheed said. "I'm not going to be a part of this circus."


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Harold Sutton October 12, 2011 | 10:09 a.m.

Amendments to any bill/proposed legislation should only relate directly to the subject on the table instead of add-ons that may or may not apply.

Some amendments that are atempted and often included appear to be like "how big a standard pet door must be" when the actual piece of legislation is supposed to be about what is the proper way of disposing of used chemical containers.

Rediculous!!! If the voters only knew what is frequently proposed as amendments sometimes, there would be a lot of turnover of politicians from small local towns right on up to Washinton, D. C. Both parties included!

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.