advertisement

THE WEEK IN MISSOURI FOOTBALL: Exploring other options, another road loss

Sunday, October 9, 2011 | 6:29 p.m. CDT; updated 8:43 p.m. CST, Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Linebacker Zaviar Gooden tackles Kansas State running back John Hubert in the fourth quarter of the Missouri game against Kansas State on Saturday. Hubert ran for 126 yards.

Conference realignment dominated the headlines last week before Missouri lost for the third time this season.

Exploring other options

On Tuesday, the UM System Board of Curators granted MU Chancellor Brady Deaton the power to explore other conference options for Missouri. The curators did not decide to commit to the Big 12, despite the efforts of other school presidents to hold the conference together.

If Deaton chooses to leave the Big 12, it appears that it would be to join Texas A&M in migrating from the Big 12 to the Southeastern Conference. The SEC has not publicly expressed an interest in Missouri, but Tennessee athletic director Dave Hart said he expects the SEC to add another school. The addition of Texas A&M leaves the SEC currently with 13 schools, an awkward number for scheduling purposes. A move to the SEC would be a big change for all Missouri sports, not just football.

Despite not getting a commitment from Missouri, the Big 12 made steps to move forward last week. The Big 12 board agreed to a six-year grant of television rights, making it more difficult for any school to leave the conference. The board also unanimously decided to begin negotiations to add Texas Christian University to the Big 12. TCU is expected to approve a move to the Big 12 this week. The Horned Frogs won the Rose Bowl last season and have won 48 games since the beginning of the 2007 season.

According to a CBS Sports report, the Big 12 also expressed interest in adding Air Force to the conference but was turned down. BYU, Louisville and West Virginia have also been mentioned as other possible Big 12 expansion candidates.

Another road loss

Coming off a bye week, the Tigers (2-3) suffered another disappointing road loss Saturday, this time a 24-17 defeat at the hands of No. 17 Kansas State (5-0).

Kansas State has had a lot of success running the ball this season, and the Missouri defense wasn't able to take that away. The Wildcats ran for 174 yards and scored all three of their touchdowns on running plays.

The Missouri offense didn't do its defense any favors, making mistakes and failing to convert on big plays. The Tigers only converted four of their 13 third-down attempts, and kicker Grant Ressell missed two field goals. Ressell has now missed six field goals this season after missing just three in the two previous seasons combined.

Missouri now has a losing record for the first time since Nov. 6, 2004.

Next up: Iowa State

All three of Missouri's losses this season have come on the road, while both wins have come at home. Fortunately, the Tigers return to the friendly Faurot Field on Saturday to face Iowa State (3-2). The game is at 1 p.m. as part of a full day of Homecoming festivities at MU.

Missouri has not lost to Iowa State since 2006 and has not lost a home game to Iowa State since 2001. The Tigers' all-time record against the Cyclones is 60-33-9.

Iowa State comes in on a two-game losing streak after losing to Baylor on Saturday. The Cyclones won their three games by a total of eight points, including a 44-41 overtime win against Iowa.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Peter Demarco October 10, 2011 | 11:03 a.m.

A move to the SEC will be great.... for other SEC schools. MU is last in the Big 12...they won't stand a chance in the SEC. If MU wants to be a perpetual doormat, they should definitely make the move. But if MU ever want to have a hope of being competitive again, it better stay in the Big 12. The reason the SEC would even consider MU is because they need another school to be a football bottom feeder like Vanderbilt and Kentucky. The good schools need more easy conference wins so their records and rankings will look better. Everything shouldn't be about money. So if you merely want to make more money by being a member of the SEC, you'll find your greedy selves at the bottom of the SEC feeding chain for decades to come.

(Report Comment)
Donald Moore October 10, 2011 | 3:45 p.m.

The comment left by Mr. Demarco is ridiculous. MU has 40 wins in football over the past 4 seasons. They are clearly not bottom feeders in the Big 12, nor would they be a bottom feeder in the SEC. I am sure that Coach Pinkel,his staff,and the MU football team would have as much success in the SEC as in the Big 12. This is a rebuilding year for the football team having lost a starting quarterback and defensive end who were first round draft picks, as well as their starting defensive secondary. Their starting left tackle was also lost before the start of the season along with other key injuries. The new starting quarter back has only started five games and has shown the potential of becoming an outstanding college if not pro quarterback. So Mr. Demarco your comments have no base in fact and appear only to be an attempt to demean MU sports. If you think so poorly of MU sports teams then why would you comment on an article about them? While I now reside out of state I grew up 20 miles from the MU campus and followed the great programs of Dan Devine and Norm Stewart. I will always be a fan of MU no matter if they are in the Big 12 or the SEC.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements