advertisement

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Meeting with the Attorney General's Office resolved issues about a sexual assault case

Friday, October 14, 2011 | 6:58 p.m. CDT

To the Editor:

Recently I wrote a guest commentary for the Columbia Missourian (Oct. 3, 2011), part of which was critical of the Missouri attorney general's disposition of the Ken Storla prosecution. (Storla had admitted to sexually assaulting his two granddaughters.)

As a result, a few days later, I and two other directors of Grandparents and Others on Watch, Inc., met with Matt Dameron, the attorney general's chief of staff.

Also at the meeting were the deputy attorney general, who approved a plea deal with Storla, and the senior prosecutor who brokered the deal. They reviewed the case and their process with us.

The Attorney General's office had a well-reasoned purpose in the course of action settled upon. We were most impressed with their passion for protecting children, their support for what GrOW is trying to do and their determined professionalism.  

As the meeting broke up, the senior prosecutor asked GrOW to take three things back into our communities.  

1. "Every Child — Every Time." Far too often children who have been sexually assaulted do not receive medical attention, she said. It is very important that they do, and if at all possible, have it include a "sexual assault forensic examination."

2. "The forensic interview is only the beginning." Too often, it is presented to the child as if it will conclude the process.

3.  "Advocate for children in the community." GrOW asks the community to join us in this advocacy and in support of child advocacy centers and the dedicated public officials in the Attorney General's Office.

Dan William Peek lives in Columbia and is a member of Grandparents and Others on Watch, Inc., www.grow-america.org.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Michael Carter November 16, 2011 | 3:23 a.m.

I am the victim of repeated sexual assaults, and I have to add that I am a male; the reason I mention this is that for a male I do not believe the regression, rejection, abuse, degredation, feelings of weakness and fault, are any different than what a female feels whether the attack is violent and by a stranger, or non-violent and by someone you know love and trust who has decided to take advantage of you. What I do know too, is this, that no matter what the case it always will affect one's sexual stimulation, performance, safety and trust, security, and emotional stability with anyone you choose to partner with. And you never get over that, yes, one can get better; but never as if it had never happened. So, should there be extrastential treatment and efforts for and on the behalf of victims? A resounding 100 percent resounding yes, because it will help to speed up recovery - but it will never go away.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements