City Council approves Trial E for new ward boundaries

Monday, October 17, 2011 | 11:42 p.m. CDT; updated 9:54 p.m. CDT, Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Trial E expands the First Ward west to Silvey Street. It moves Columbia Mall into the First Ward and splits part of the Park DeVille neighborhood.

*This story has been corrected to say that comments made by Kip Kendrick on behalf of Terry Baker on Monday night reflected Baker's personal opinion and not the position of the Park de Ville Neighborhood Association.

COLUMBIA —The decision brought a standing ovation.

Fourth Ward Councilman Daryl Dudley was the only dissenting vote as the City Council adopted new political boundaries Monday evening based on a 6-1 vote for Trial E.


Related Media

Trial E extends the western boundary of the First Ward to Silvey Street. It moves Columbia Mall from the Second Ward to the First Ward and splits a portion of the Park de Ville neighborhood.

Trial E was the most favored proposal during Monday's public hearing. In more than an hour of public comment, only John Clark spoke in support of the amended version of Trial D. Charles Dudley was the lone member of the public to not support any of the maps.

"The people are here and they have spoken," Sixth Ward Councilwoman Barbara Hoppe said at the close of the public hearing.

Before the vote began, Fifth Ward Councilwoman Helen Anthony urged her fellow council members to vote for Trial E. She said voting for any other map might hinder the city and the council.

"You never want to get in the way of an engaged citizenry," Mayor Bob McDavid said.

Kip Kendrick, president of the Benton-Stephens Neighborhood Association, was the first to speak and asked other neighborhood association leaders to stand in support of Trial E with him. Eleven associations stood and voiced support.

Kendrick also spoke on behalf of Terry Baker, president of the Park de Ville Neighborhood Association, who personally supported Trial E even though it would split  her neighborhood. The association did not take an official position on the issue. Baker said in an email to the Missourian on Tuesday that she believed Trial E was the least contentious map and met the goals of the Ward Reapportionment Committee.*

Steve Calloway spoke for the Men's Minority Network in favor of Trial E.

People in the audience also held pieces of paper with a large letter E and the quote "E is for everyone."

Kurt Albert changed this phrase in his comments, saying "E is for excellence."

Trial E received the only favorable vote, 5-3, from the Ward Reapportionment Committee.

Although it initially appeared to have contiguity issues, the MKT Nature and Fitness Trail was found to be a connector for the Fifth Ward.

Third Ward Councilman Gary Kespohl asked if the MKT trail, used as a connector for the Fifth Ward in Trial E, was a legal boundary.

He said he saw the trail as partly in the city and partly in the county. Scott Boulevard was the reason the initial Trial D was found to be not contiguous at the council meeting Sept. 19.

Scott Boulevard is a county road and annexation would only stretch the city limits to the middle of the road, making it not a contiguous boundary, which goes against the city's charter.

Kespohl said the city should follow the rules it had laid out and "throw out all of (the maps) out and start over."

Whispers and gasps were heard across the room until City Counselor Fred Boeckman said the entire MKT trail was owned by the city, not the county, and was a legal boundary.

The trail also serves as a legal boundary for Trials A and B, but these were not passed by the council.

A majority of the speakers who favored Trial E also told the council they did not favor Trial D and especially its amended cousin.

The amended map was brought to the council at a previous meeting by Dudley after the original Trial D was found to be illegal. Citizens opposed to his amendment began a petition to recall Dudley and gathered signatures over the weekend.

Dudley defended his map by saying that, although Trial E had five positive votes from the Ward Reapportionment Committee, Trial D was a close second with four votes. He wanted to consider its recommendation by making Trial D contiguous.

Dudley said his amended trial map was not a political move.

Speaking in the public hearing, Rex Campbell, a former Fourth Ward councilman, said Trial D-amended moved precincts out of the Fourth Ward where Dudley had performed poorly in the 2010 election.

"If I were Mr. Dudley, I'd want to get that out of my ward," Campbell said.

Second Ward Councilman Jason Thornhill said he thought the recall petition in the Fourth Ward was a "misguided, personal affront" to Dudley.

Speaking after the meeting, Jeremy Root, who is involved in the recall petition effort, said he was pleased with Trial E's passage.

He was unsure of how many signatures had been turned in and if all of them were valid. If there is the right amount of signatures, 1,520, then the recall of Dudley will be put on the next ballot.

With the passing of Trial E, many of the neighborhoods involved in the petition effort still belong in Dudley's ward.

Each trial was listed as a separate ordinance on the council agenda. In total there were five maps — A, B, D, E and D-amended — and the council voted on each map separately. Only Kespohl voted for multiple maps, A, E and D-amended.

The Ward Reapportionment Committee was formed in May and charged with task of finding a solution for redistricting. Chairman Bob Pugh presented its final report to the council Sept. 19.

The last time the city reapportioned the wards was 2001.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Jeremy Calton October 18, 2011 | 11:47 a.m.

Dudley's firm ethical stance that if he takes money for a vote, he'll give you that vote no matter what, should earn him some new vote-buying clients. Democracy inaction!

(Report Comment)
Tracy Greever-Rice October 18, 2011 | 12:01 p.m.

Kudos to the Missourian on their coverage of redistricting over the past couple of months. The reporting has been thorough, nuanced and accurate. I was only there for the final 15-20 minutes of last night's redistricting hearing, but several folks have commented to me on how well this particular story does at capturing the points of view expressed. Should all reporting on politics, local to global, be as even-handed and fair.

(Report Comment)
Jimmy Bearfield October 18, 2011 | 12:45 p.m.

"Dudley's firm ethical stance that if he takes money for a vote, he'll give you that vote no matter what, should earn him some new vote-buying clients."

He took money in exchange for his vote? From whom? How much? When? He's on the take? That's a pretty bold claim. I'd be worried about being sued for libel, if I were you.

(Report Comment)
terry baker October 18, 2011 | 12:54 p.m.

During the public hearing, Kip Kendrick spoke related to the plan and the Park de Ville Neighborhood Association. His words were reported in error. Park de Ville Neighborhood has/had no official position on redistricting; I had no comments from members for or against any of the plans offerred. I personally feel/felt that Trial E was the least contentious while still meeting the goals given to the Committee. Thank you. Terry Baker, President. Park de Ville Neighborhood Association

(Report Comment)
Karen Miller October 18, 2011 | 2:22 p.m.

Ms. Baker,

I am the reporter on this story. Thank you for bringing the error to our attention. It has been corrected in the story.

Karen Miller, reporter
Columbia Missourian

(Report Comment)
Matt Wilkinson October 18, 2011 | 9:45 p.m.
This comment has been removed.

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.