WHAT OTHERS SAY: Missouri River needs room to roam

Thursday, October 27, 2011 | 5:50 p.m. CDT; updated 7:45 p.m. CDT, Thursday, October 27, 2011

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers this week has been playing rope-a-dope with its critics as it listens to flood-weary Midwestern farmers and residents wanting answers about why the Missouri River flood of 2011 was so bad.

If the corps' first meeting in Omaha, Neb., was any indication, expect few answers and no changes from the corps in protecting the Missouri River basin states from flooding next year. The corps might just let the public punch itself out.

Frankly, this is to be expected, and that's not necessarily a criticism of the corps.

This year's flood was epic because Mother Nature chose to combine a record rainfall with a record snowpack. The corps' outdated Master Manual for balancing the various needs along the river hasn't been updated to account for climate change, population growth or shifting priorities.

So while residents of Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Montana and the Dakotas have angry words for the corps, the real action will be in Washington, D.C., where senators, led by Republican Roy Blunt and Democrat Claire McCaskill of Missouri, have begun to plan for the future.

It is up to Congress to give the corps new marching orders to better protect the Midwest from increasingly powerful floods brought on by a combination of climate change and man's folly in thinking that he could contain the river.

The most important advice from the first hearing on the future of Missouri River flood control came from Nicholas Pinter, a geology professor at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale who has been studying U.S. river management for more than 15 years.

Mr. Pinter's advice to the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works was to look to the Dutch:

"When climate research in the Netherlands predicted a 12.5 percent increase in flood volumes later in the 21st century, the Dutch government responded with an aggressive and forward-thinking policy of 'Room for the Rivers,' investing heavily in giving rivers more room to safely convey flood flows. At present, the U.S. remains on the opposite path — continuing to constrict our river channels and allowing steady encroachment onto our flood plains."

Now is the time to offer to buy farmland before flood waters rise again. It's time to choose which levees get rebuilt and which are destroyed to give the river the room it demands. It's time to forget about keeping reservoirs artificially high for recreation and rebuilding downstream navigational structures that narrow the river and boost its flow.

These are not decisions the corps can or will make overnight or even before next year's flood season.

But if politicians from the basin states are serious about making flood control the No. 1 priority in managing the river, this must be the direction of U.S. policy.

Copyright St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Reprinted with permission.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.