DEAR READER: New Missourian commenting procedure hopes to remove spam

Friday, November 18, 2011 | 1:15 p.m. CST

Dear Reader,

Your comments are an important part of the Missourian's journalism. When you choose to share your expertise and your perspective, you enrich the conversation that has naturally occurred around the news forever. (I'm fond of saying that "social media" has been around since people started mailing newspaper clippings and, before that, saying, "did you hear …".)


Related Media

The newsroom, and specifically the community outreach team, has been taking a look this fall at what kinds of conversations spring up on our website. Tom Warhover wrote a column last month about our approach to comments, and he's written in the past about why we ask you to use your real names when you post.

I'm writing today to tell you about the next phase of our evolution. We're going to add a step to the process for new commenters. As of today, when a user posts his or her first comment, the comment will be looked at by the newsroom before it is published to make sure it adheres to our policy.

This extra hurdle will, we hope, solve our problem with spam. Several times a week, new accounts are created on our site by people who are posting links to websites or advertising businesses. They often post the same thing under as many stories as they can in the time it takes the newsroom to notice it and delete their user accounts.

The spam degrades your user experience in a couple of ways. One, it's annoying. Two, it makes it harder for you to find the real conversation, among real people, on real issues. It's especially vexing to watch spam take over the "Latest Comments" feed on our homepage, as the picture with this column demonstrates.

This extra hurdle of waiting for moderation will be an inconvenience for new users, we realize. But we hope the payoff will be worth it.

As an added benefit of this new feature (which was programmed in by our IT staff this week), we can decide to moderate the comments of any individual users if we have reason to be concerned about what they might post. As the system worked before, users either could comment freely or were barred from commenting entirely. Now we have an intermediate step of moderating their comments before the rest of you see them.

If someone posts using initials rather than a full name, for example, we can invite them to update their profile and then have a way to double check that they've added a whole name before they comment again. Or if someone's comments have been flagged by other users or by the newsroom as containing personal attacks, we can check their new comments before letting them be public.

We hope conversation is one of the things you value about the Missourian and that this change will improve your experience. As always, we welcome your feedback.

Joy Mayer is the director of community outreach for the Missourian. She can be reached at and at 573-882-8182.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Jimmy Bearfield November 19, 2011 | 9:56 a.m.

More sites need to screen new posters this way. Smart move.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith November 19, 2011 | 1:06 p.m.

Sounds good. Hopefully it will discourage our little friend who plugs his sportswear by posting multiple entries on the site early in the morning, especially weekends.

Perhaps it will also discourage "celebrity appearances," such as the one by Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum, aka Ayn Rand, author and philosopher - but, rest assured, quite dead, having died in 1982.

I was partial to Sally Rand (the fan dancer).

(Report Comment)
Steve Baumann November 19, 2011 | 2:40 p.m.

I appreciate the lack of spam, very much so.
Thank you!

(Report Comment)
Derrick Fogle November 19, 2011 | 5:10 p.m.

Ditto what Steve says. I really appreciate all the time and effort dedicated to keeping this forum clean.

(Report Comment)
Joy Mayer November 19, 2011 | 7:10 p.m.

Thanks for the positive feedback, guys! I'd welcome negative feedback, too. Does anyone think the hurdle of having the first comment approved is too inconvenient?

Joy Mayer,
Columbia Missourian

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith November 20, 2011 | 6:08 a.m.

@ Joy Mayer:

Where is there a need, in this particular situation, for negative comment? No one playing by the rules needs to comment negatively; those not playing by the rules will remain silent.

I thank you, and Ayn Rand (from her grave) thanks you.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.