advertisement

WHAT OTHERS SAY: Higher cigarette tax would improve health care, schools in Missouri

Monday, November 21, 2011 | 11:41 a.m. CST; updated 8:53 p.m. CST, Tuesday, January 24, 2012

A serious effort is under way to raise Missouri’s lowest-in-the-nation cigarette tax — a move that would vastly improve the health of both citizens and the state’s finances.

Gov. Jay Nixon and legislative leaders should be leading this charge. Not only does Missouri’s ridiculous 17-cents-a-pack tax deprive the state of badly needed revenues, researchers have estimated that smoking costs the state’s Medicaid system more than $600 million a year.

But the Democratic governor and Republican legislative leaders have not mustered the courage to place the health of Missouri citizens above their reluctance to support a tax boost. And so a citizens’ coalition has mounted a statewide initiative petition campaign.

The coalition, led by the American Cancer Society, this week replaced a petition filed earlier with the Missouri Secretary of State’s office with a slightly modified version. It asks voters to increase the tax on a pack of cigarettes to 90 cents. That is still far below the national average of $1.43 a pack.

The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids in Washington estimates that a 73-cent increase on a pack of cigarettes would bring in $283 million a year for cash-strapped Missouri.

The ballot initiative proposes creating a “health and education trust fund,” to hold revenues from the 73-cent increase. It calls for 20 percent of the net proceeds to be used for smoking prevention and cessation efforts, 50 percent to be used for elementary and secondary education and 30 percent to benefit public colleges and universities, with a fourth of that amount earmarked for the education of health care providers.

Designating the money makes sense. Although the state has one of the nation’s highest smoking rates, Missouri leaders have reneged on previous promises to spend money on preventing tobacco use and helping people quit. And the trust fund would provide another source of reliable revenue to public schools and universities.

Attempts to raise Missouri’s cigarette tax through a statewide vote failed narrowly in 2002 and 2006, after vehement resistance from tobacco lobbyists. But Missouri’s new, ignominious distinction as the nation’s cheapest place in which to purchase cigarettes ought to persuade voters this time.

Copyright Kansas City Star. Reprinted with permission.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Jimmy Bearfield November 21, 2011 | 12:15 p.m.

Whatever happened to all of that money that riverboat gambling was supposed to provide for schools? Is that a "source of reliable revenue to public schools and universities"?

(Report Comment)
Brueno Gehard November 21, 2011 | 12:36 p.m.
This comment has been removed.
James Krewson November 21, 2011 | 12:40 p.m.

Ok if higher cigarette taxes are to support healthcare, what happens if the higher cost drives more people to quit. If more people quit smoking, more children would be without health care. The whole logic of using cigarette taxes to fund healthcare eludes me. Bottomline what you are saying is that you want MORE people to smoke to help supplement MORE healthcare that will be needed down the road to help MORE cigarette smokers who get sick and die from illnesses related to smoking. Do people actually use their brains when thinking about this?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements