GEORGE KENNEDY: Let's turn the spotlight on well-intentioned bad ideas

Thursday, December 1, 2011 | 4:44 p.m. CST; updated 9:11 p.m. CST, Thursday, December 1, 2011

Scarcity is much in the news as we plunge into our season of excess. We’re lacking affordable housing, available jobs and even causes of optimism. That’s not intended to be a comprehensive list.

Something that’s never in short supply, however, is bad ideas.

One of those was just passed into law by our City Council. Another would alter the very composition of the council. Let’s take a quick look.

At their meeting last week, our council members – their wits no doubt dulled by the hours of public testimony on both sides of the Regency mobile home park rezoning – changed the law to permit skates and skateboards to be ridden on the public streets, even downtown.

This cockamamie idea is promoted by the well-intentioned folks who want to get us out of our cars and into healthier forms of transportation. It’s an idea that seems a lot more attractive in the abstract, or in the council chamber, than it looks on the actual street.

I submit that kids on skateboards mixing with cars and buses are accidents waiting to happen. Why we’d want to encourage those accidents as a matter of public policy is one of many things I just don’t understand.

Another mystery to me is why we should elect some or all of our council members citywide rather than by wards as we do now. Oh, it’s clear enough why the Chamber of Commerce and the big developers would prefer that. To see why, just recall our last two local elections.

In 2010, the Chamber endorsed and the big money got behind Bob McDavid, running citywide for mayor. He outspent Jerry Wade more than 2-to-1 and won handily.

In 2011, the Chamber endorsed and the big money got behind Glen Ehrhardt in the Fifth Ward. The progressive candidate, Helen Anthony, ran a very smart, very local campaign and beat him.

The argument in favor of at-large council seats has two parts, as I understand it. The first, and more plausible, is that people elected citywide are more likely to take a broad perspective on citywide issues. The other I’ve seen advanced is that single-member districts encourage gerrymandering.

As to the first argument, I simply ask that you search the records for instances in which council members elected by ward have voted against the interest of the city as a whole.

Sure, they sometimes differ as to just what is really in the city’s interest. But I try to watch their actions fairly carefully, and I can’t think of any examples of excessive parochialism. (Wrong-headedness, sure. See the skateboard decision. But unanimous wrong-headedness.)

As to the second argument, it’s true that we’ve just seen an attempted gerrymander. The perpetrators were the same folks who favor at-large elections. In the end, however, the ward-chosen council spurned the attempt.

Representation by ward, on the other hand, gives us the kind of attention to neighborhood interests that we should want and expect from our elected rulers.

Would Barbara Hoppe have devoted so much effort and emotion to the plight of the Regency renters if they weren’t her Sixth Ward constituents, and hers alone? Would Daryl Dudley have tried so valiantly to bridge the gap between birders and bikers if that Audubon tract weren’t in his Fourth Ward?

It seems clear to me that at-large campaigns would inevitably diminish that kind of attention to neighborhood-specific issues while driving up the cost of politics and favoring candidates with access to the most money.

The analogy that’s been drawn to the Columbia School Board is false. The board doesn’t rezone or annex or decide who pays the cost of infrastructure. The developers aren’t against good schools. They just don’t want to pay their fair share of the costs of growth.

Now, if you think I’m right about the skateboard issue, call your council member while you still have one.

George Kennedy is a former managing editor at the Missourian and professor emeritus at the Missouri School of Journalism.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


tina fey December 2, 2011 | 7:19 a.m.

There is a reason that members of the City Council gather public support and are VOTED by popular demand into their positions. They represent ideas supported by their constituents. That, Georgie Boy, is the way representative government works.

On the other hand, Georgie Boy Kennedy has been elected to NOTHING, but instead appointed to an editorial position of a paper supported by public taxpayer funds. Since he is voted to NOTHING, he can publicly foment liberal jibber-jabber without repercussion. He is accountable to no one but the 12 kids aged 18-24 who read his column.

But shouldn't Georgie Boy Kennedy represent the positions of ALL of his constituents - the taxpayers who pay his salary and give their money to support this newspaper? Have you ever heard a comment from Georgie Boy Kennedy that makes sense from a conservative or objective perspective? NO, he has never shown us that leadership.

Instead, Georgie Boy Kennedy shows us poor leadership by putting forth HIS ideas, HIS liberal positions, HIS public comments that reflect HIS powerless liberal anger and fomenting.

The state of Missouri and the people of this country deserve better leadership in media. Georgie Boy Kennedy believes that he is accountable to no one, that he can make any idiotic statement without reproach. Dear Readers, we deserve better. Dear Reader, shouldn't Georgie Boy Kennedy be answerable to us?

Contact Georgie Boy Kennedy to ask him to be more accurate, more fair and balanced, and foment less liberally and angrily.

After all, that pen Georgie Boy Kennedy holds is not HIS, it is owned by the people who would like to have all of their perspectives represented.

George Kennedy, you are an unenlightened hypocrite. Start wising up!

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith December 2, 2011 | 8:14 a.m.

Where are Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall when we so badly need them? :)

(Report Comment)
Mike Martin December 2, 2011 | 8:51 a.m.

Actually Ms. Fey, Mr. Kennedy is on point with much of this editorial, which addresses a scheme to create "at large" Columbia City Council seats that would require big bucks for campaigns.

I broke a 2-part story about the scheme last month, discussing at some length the problems with it:

I'm not expert enough to comment on the ordinance permitting skateboarding, but I do know that several downtown business people thought it silly when skateboards were banned several years ago.

Mike Martin
The Columbia Heart Beat

(Report Comment)
Vega Bond December 2, 2011 | 7:41 p.m.

Wow, tina. That sure was a lot of effort that you expended for those twelve kids. How old are you?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.