WHAT OTHERS SAY: Tax Internet sales and correct fundamental inequity

Wednesday, January 18, 2012 | 12:59 p.m. CST

Issues of taxation being debated at the national, state and local levels invariably focus on the fundamental question: What is fair?

Sales taxes collected by local merchants but not by online vendors exemplifies unfairness.

We agree with the local merchants who believe this inequity is unjust and places them at a competitive disadvantage.

Proposals have been advanced at both the state and national levels to require Internet merchants to collect established sales taxes.

Opponents contend this would constitute a new tax, which some — largely Republicans — have pledged to fight.

Proponents disagree. They say the tax exists but isn’t collected uniformly.

Proposals addressing the inequity of sales tax collections are expected to be filed in the state legislature, including one planned by Rep. Mary Still, D-Columbia.

She estimated Missouri revenues would increase by $20 million in the first year of online sales tax collections.

In Congress, U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt, a Republican, is cosponsor of the Marketplace Fairness Act, which would allow states to collect sales taxes owed to them from online retailers.

"Let’s face it," Blunt said. "People often go to their neighborhood store to 'try on' the wedding dress or look at the new power tools and then buy the same products online. If the major difference in the price was the sales tax — which the local merchant does not keep — that's not fair."

Retailers — and some elected officials — also point out that local merchants bolster the economy and donate to community activities.

Those observations are accurate, but our quarrel centers on the fundamental inequity.

Local merchants fulfill their legal obligation to collect and pass on sales taxes to state and local governments. Their competitors are under no such obligation.

That is a fundamental unfairness — one that is tantamount to government designating a category of tax collectors and then punishing them with competitive disadvantage.

Copyright Jefferson City News Tribune. Reprinted with permission.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Charles leverett January 18, 2012 | 2:45 p.m.

Fairness huh. Well then we need to make local retailers wait about a week before allowing the customer to take home their product. Let's face it, even with sales tax, online resalers will be cheaper in many, or most, cases, meaning they won't get an increase in business from it. In the end it will only be additional taxes that will hurt the middle and lower class, but apparently that isn't important anymore as long as it's "fair".

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.