advertisement

WHAT OTHERS SAY: State must stop gutting Missouri's universities

Tuesday, February 7, 2012 | 6:00 a.m. CST; updated 5:06 p.m. CST, Tuesday, February 7, 2012

It's a sign of the times that the interim president of the University of Missouri System began his "state of the university" message with a roundup of cost-saving measures.

The system's four campuses saved $222 million over the past three years through steps such as fewer workers, deferred maintenance and energy savings, Steve Owens told the UM SystemBoard of Curators during its most recent meeting in Kansas City. The system eliminated 29 degree programs. Its schools spend 21 percent less on administrative expenses than comparable public institutions around the nation.

At the same time, all four campuses are serving increasing numbers of students. MU enrolled 10 percent more freshmen in 2011 than the year before.

"Last year was a remarkably eventful and productive year," Owens said. "We achieved what we set out to do, and we continued doing more with less."

Missouri's public colleges and universities are good at that. State leaders have underfunded the schools for more than a decade. Adjusted for inflation, Missouri's funding for the operating budget of the UM System today is at 1984 levels.

Out of necessity, and because of good leadership and smart thinking, Missouri's leading universities are among the most lean and efficient in the nation.

But Gov. Jay Nixon's budget for next year calls for a devastating 12.5 percent cut in higher education funding. The governor lectured the schools in his State of the State address to "run smarter, more efficient operations."

That talk is a transparent attempt to deflect the blame for inevitable tuition increases. The schools should continue searching for ways to save money. But the irresponsible player is the state of Missouri.

Naturally, tuition increases are back on the table. The curators are mulling increases ranging from 9 percent at Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla to 3 percent at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. Other public colleges and universities are calculating how much more they can reasonably ask students to pay.

The answer: Not very much. Tuition at many Missouri universities is higher than what families pay in states like Kansas. Students take on unacceptably high debt loads to go to school. There is no way Missouri's universities can ask students to make up for the level of cuts that Nixon is proposing.

Nor can they continue to cut their way to balanced budgets. Leaders estimate nearly half the buildings in the UM System need repairs. Staff and faculty at most publicly supported schools have gone years without raises. The starting salary for a doctorate-level chemistry professor at highly regarded Truman State University in Kirksville is $41,000.

It's past time for Missouri to stop gutting its colleges and universities. Republican and Democratic legislators have expressed concern about Nixon’s proposed cuts. They should find a way to moderate them.

If Nixon and lawmakers are serious about Missouri having "an educated workforce to compete in the global economy," as they repeatedly proclaim, they will get behind long-term funding solutions for higher education.

An essential first step would be loud and clear support for a ballot initiative to raise Missouri's lowest-in-the-nation cigarette tax to 90 cents a pack.

The initiative, sponsored by a coalition of health and education groups, earmarks 30 percent of the anticipated $283 million a year in revenues for public colleges and universities, and 50 percent for elementary and secondary schools.

It would be a refreshing shift to see the state's leaders — especially Nixon — move from blaming the schools for the state’s higher education crisis to endorsing a way out of it.

Copyright Kansas City Star. Reprinted with permission.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Jimmy Bearfield February 8, 2012 | 11:18 a.m.

"Tuition at many Missouri universities is higher than what families pay in states like Kansas."

MU’s tuition is below the averages of the SEC, Big 12, Big Ten and the AAU.

"Students take on unacceptably high debt loads to go to school."

Parents and students will continue to pay, if recent history is any guide. As MU Budget Director Tim Rooney said a couple of weeks ago, “Every time we’ve increased tuition, we’ve had record enrollment.” Parents and students also have consistently voted - including with their wallets -- for amenities such as new dorms and major renovations to Brady Commons and the rec center.

If you don't want to take on debt, start saving for college as soon as your child is born. You'd have to be living under a rock not to have seen all of the 529 ads, and that's just one option for saving.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams February 8, 2012 | 11:44 a.m.

Jimmy says, "If you don't want to take on debt, start saving for college as soon as your child is born."
____________________

Gasp! But I want that iPhone!

I want, I want, I want, I want, I want, I want, I want, I want, I want, I want, ..........

Someone else will pick up the tab anyway, so why should I pay attention to your silly advice?

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams February 8, 2012 | 11:50 a.m.

I'll support the additional cigarette tax if accompanied by an equal-percentage increase in taxes for ALL forms of alcohol.

Of course, that won't happen; alcohol is an acceptable form of drug dosage, too many legislators use it, the lobby is too powerful, and no one will willingly gore their favorite ox.

More better to gore your neighbor's ox.

(PS: I'm pretty sure Ms Still doesn't smoke, but I wonder if she partakes a nip of ethanol now and then? Inquiring minds want to know.)

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements