Columbia School Board votes to approve new school attendance boundaries

Monday, February 13, 2012 | 10:23 p.m. CST; updated 11:48 p.m. CST, Monday, February 13, 2012

COLUMBIA — The Columbia School Board voted 6-1 Monday evening to approve scenario B for intermediate and high school boundaries when Battle High School opens in 2013. 

The boundary scenario splits secondary boundaries into six intermediate schools and three high schools. It was recommended to the board by the Secondary Enrollment Planning Committee, which was in charge of creating the new boundary maps.

New school boundaries

Here's a map of the approved Approach B for high schools that allows you to zoom in for a closer look at the boundaries. This map shows Approach B for intermediate schools.

Related Media

Related Articles

Board member Michelle Pruitt dissented, saying she heard concerns from Hickman High School parents about the distances their children would have to travel to school under the new boundaries. Some students who currently attend Hickman will be moved to Rock Bridge High School in scenario B.

For those students, the new boundaries would move them to a high school farther away, which Pruitt said could make it harder to participate in after-school activities. She said some students already face barriers to being involved at school, and eliminating the ability to walk to school doesn't help.

"To me, those are the students who are at the most risk to not be able to find a spot in the school community where they fit in," she said.

Board President Tom Rose said that while he couldn't make any promises, he could see how parents could make an argument for having an educational reason for a transfer in the case of students who live within walking distance of a school.

"There just isn't going to be a completely perfect solution," board member Helen Wade said.

Wade said that while the transition would be difficult, students will adjust and succeed in the schools they will attend. She said she spoke as a parent of an elementary school student who will be affected by the boundary changes. Wade added that she attended multiple schools growing up and "it didn't kill (her)."

Rose said the district had to balance the needs of each student with the needs of the district as a whole when making its decision.

Superintendent Chris Belcher said part of education is the culture developed in the school, not just the specific building. He said the district needs to focus its energy on getting kids excited about where they go to school and not on solving every small geographical issue.

"I think we've looked at this every possible way," Belcher said. "We're going to have to make a decision and just know that there will be some people (whose) preferences would be different."

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Richard Saunders February 14, 2012 | 11:05 a.m.

Simply put, artificial boundaries destroy otherwise natural communities. Once again, the evil-do(good)ers have succeeded in "doing something" proactive.

Here's a clue to the planners that insist upon managing others' lives. A school should be a HUB of a district, never on its outskirts (sans a large natural border, perhaps).

That this decision is accomplished by those who are in charge of educating the children of this community should cause one to take note of just where the true problems lie (all while noting how far removed they are from the solutions offered).

Any child currently living within a reasonable distance to Hickman (as compared to other schools) should be allowed to attend it. It's idiotic to bus those kids across town, while at the same time, busing other kids into Hickman. Not only are they wasting scarce resources that affect the budget, they waste the most precious resource, the life of the child, who will unnecessarily spend an hour or more in a rolling cage, all so that some social planner ensures diversity. In this case, "diversity" means separation from friends and familiar places, substituting isolation and strangers in some social experiment. Because while these are your children, they are their guinea pigs. Remember, they are the professionals here, while we are merely parents. They will do what they believe best, regardless of the destruction it creates, as their eventual failure is their next opportunity for the next grand experiment to alleviate the "social decay" that they will blame on everything but their own actions.

It's been obvious over the years that the CPS Board members do not understand economics. Now we can add logic to their list of deficiencies as well.

I would advocate that any affected child and their parents ignore the so-called "boundaries" decreed by the know-it-alls and occupy the school of their choice. Then lets see how well the "leaders" can really lead, by solving problems for once, rather than creating them.

For instance, the very first time I saw the "choices" provided, I saw that none of them had a logical district built around Hickman. Now just why was that, again?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.