advertisement

WHAT OTHERS SAY: It's time for Missouri's governor to go bold

Sunday, February 26, 2012 | 6:00 a.m. CST

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon is never short on initiatives.

He’s got the Show-Me Heroes Initiative to put returning veterans to work. He recently rolled out MoHealthWINS to prepare community college students for health careers.

In a meeting with The Kansas City Star’s editorial board Tuesday, Nixon recounted more initiatives and characterized them as “working the problem.” Clearly, he wants his administration to be judged by the sum of its many parts.

The Democratic governor has cause to be proud of the way he has steered the state through a historic economic crisis. As he noted, Missouri has a triple-A bond rating. Savings in highway maintenance expenses will free up $500 million for roads and bridges in the next few years. Nixon’s team has created lasting efficiencies in state government.

But in a sense, the difficult economy has given Nixon cause to settle for small victories and cautious thinking.

“It’s a time when you need to be careful but steadfast,” he said. “You’re hitting a lot of singles to get through.”

That approach works up to a point. However, it won’t make a dent in Missouri’s big, long-term problems.

One is the state’s inability to sufficiently fund its colleges and universities. Another is its high incidence of chronic, preventable health conditions, which diminish productivity and quality of life while costing taxpayers millions of dollars.

Nixon could help tackle those issues by lending his support to a broad-based coalition that is working on a ballot initiative to substantially increase Missouri’s cigarette tax, which at 17 cents a pack is by far the lowest in the nation. An increase to 90 cents a pack, as proposed, would bring in badly needed revenue and ultimately result in healthier citizens and fewer Medicaid costs.

But the governor hasn’t weighed in, and based on his comments Tuesday he isn’t inclined to do so.

There is “a good argument” for raising the tax, Nixon conceded, but added that, “I don’t think we’re going to solve our problems by sticking our hands in people’s pockets and taking money out.”

The big flaw in that argument is that families do pay when government fails to invest. Tuition rates go up, for instance, and taxpayers often foot the bill for medical problems that could have been headed off by strong public health initiatives.

Nixon said he’s “not ready to say” yet whether he supports tolls for Interstate 70. That perhaps is understandable, as the push for tolls is only starting to gain traction, and deserves study. But the governor at some point will have to weigh in on highway funding.

Nixon is willing to goad the Republican-dominated state legislature into working on a measure that should be easy — another try at cleaning up the state’s notoriously lax campaign-finance law.

But, disappointingly, he said he intends to take a pass on the trickier issue of setting up a health insurance exchange, as called for in the federal Affordable Care Act. That may be smart politics in an election year, but failure to act now will leave Missouri to play catch-up once a legal challenge to the constitutionality of the federal law is resolved.

Nixon is up for re-election in November but so far has not drawn a top-tier challenger. Regrettably, that good fortune has not inspired the governor to act more boldly.

To pick up on Nixon’s sports analogy, singles are fine. But if brighter days are ahead for Missouri, as the governor reasonably contends, we look forward to seeing him go long more often.

Copyright Kansas City Star. Reprinted with permission.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

James Krewson February 26, 2012 | 2:58 p.m.

More cigarette taxes? With this additional revenue stream you are dependent on people staying unhealthy and smoking in order to increase revenue. What happens if these people decide to quit because of the higher prices? More and more people are giving up cigarette smoking, does that bode well for an increase in taxes on a product that people are trending towards quitting? It is ridiculous to propose another punitive behavioral tax on a product that is dependent on keeping people sick and addicted to cigarettes.

(Report Comment)
Gregg Bush February 26, 2012 | 5:21 p.m.

From the annals of
Grover Norquist, it's the worst
Argument ever.

Or it's clever troll
Bait masquerading as a
Legitimate thought.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements