advertisement

Missouri senator wants harsher penalties in accidental hunting deaths

Tuesday, March 20, 2012 | 8:06 a.m. CDT; updated 9:32 a.m. CDT, Tuesday, March 20, 2012

JEFFERSON CITY — A Missouri lawmaker is pushing tougher penalties for hunters who accidentally kill someone.

Under existing law, the state Conservation Commission may suspend the hunting privileges of any hunter who causes an accidental death for up to five years. Legislation by Senate Majority Leader Tom Dempsey would double that to 10 years.

Dempsey, a Republican from St. Charles, says the longer suspensions are needed so that hunters understand the seriousness of killing someone, even if it is an accident.

Dempsey said a constituent asked him to seek the tougher penalty after her husband was accidentally shot and killed in 2008 while hunting turkey with a friend.

 


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Michael Williams March 20, 2012 | 11:04 a.m.

Missourian: When a hunter accidentally kills someone, is there no manslaughter or negligent homicide charge or somesuch?

How is this different from a death caused in a vehicle accident where negligence is involved?

(Report Comment)
Natalie Devlin March 20, 2012 | 4:37 p.m.

Hi, I'm on the community outreach team here at the Missourian. We did not have a reporter working on this story because it is from the Associated Press. However, I've made a few phone calls at the Missouri Department of Conservation to find the answer for you. I will update the thread if I hear back from them.

Thanks!
-Natalie Devlin

(Report Comment)
mike mentor March 20, 2012 | 4:48 p.m.

@Michael
Yes, they can be charged depending on the circumstances (how much negligence was involved). This is only about licensing and not the criminal statutes...

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams March 20, 2012 | 5:51 p.m.

Mike and Natalie: Thanks.

I was mainly responding to the article statement, "....says the longer suspensions are needed so that hunters understand the seriousness of killing someone, even if it is an accident."

It seems to me a licensing change versus a manslaughter or homicide charge does a minimal job of stressing the seriousness of the affair.

Another question to ask is.....if manslaughter or homicide IS an option, how often is it exercised? If not often, then why not?

Having said all that, I can categorically state I don't want to be in the woods with someone taking "sound" shots. Which is why I have never, and will never, hunt on public lands.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements