'Your Vote Counts!' drops initiative spurred by dog breeding regulations

Friday, March 23, 2012 | 7:42 p.m. CDT; updated 7:32 p.m. CDT, Saturday, March 24, 2012

COLUMBIA — Organizers of a proposed ballot initiative that would make it more difficult for Missouri legislators to tinker with voter-approved laws said Friday they were giving up the effort.

The ballot initiative came after lawmakers watered down laws voters approved with a 2010 ballot initiative to toughen oversight of the dog breeding industry. The initiative sought a state constitutional amendment requiring a three-fourths majority vote of both the state House and Senate to override voter-approved laws.

It was largely funded by the Humane Society of the United States, which also backed the dog breeding initiative. Your Vote Counts! had heavy opposition from Missouri agriculture, with 25 industry groups ranging from the Missouri Pork Association and the state Beef Industry Council to agribusiness heavyweights Cargill and Monsanto organizing against it under the name Missouri Farmers Care.

Dane Waters, campaign manager for Your Vote Counts!, said his group was disbanded because it had accomplished its primary goal: making state lawmakers more mindful of the people's collective voice.

"We made a decision that we're not going to submit any signatures," he said. "What we feel is important is to try and lessen the hostilities in this very partisan environment. It was one of those ballot measures that were going to very contentious between now and November. We got what we wanted — which is the legislature to listen."

Missouri Farmers Care Chairman Don Nikodim issued a written statement saying it was "a great day for everyone that believes Missourians should determine how our state government should operate and not animal-rights activists and Washington, D.C.,-based special interests."

Waters said his group had collected about 75 percent of the voter signatures needed to qualify for the November general election ballot but had been meeting in recent weeks with state lawmakers in hopes of avoiding a pitched political battle. While declining to discuss any specific assurances made, he said the campaign felt comfortable in pulling up stakes.

"We are taking a leap of faith that the lawmakers will hold true to a better environment in Jefferson City," he said. "We feel it's the right thing for us to do."

In recent years, Humane Society of the United States and other animal rights groups have targeted not just Missouri but two dozen states that allow signature-driven petitions to appear on ballots. Farm groups have responded with their own organizing efforts, with the two sides rarely sharing common ground.

Waters said he hopes the latest development in Missouri can help heal some of the mutual mistrust.

"There's nothing to be gained by the animosity that has been created in Missouri," he said.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Williams March 23, 2012 | 7:56 p.m.


(Report Comment)
Harold Sutton March 23, 2012 | 8:54 p.m.

Special interest groups usually cause more problems than they help resolve in my opinion.

It is the old adadge of "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" but then a lot of other wheels started squeaking.

The proposition had my solid support until the last week before the vote when I did some research.

If HSUS and the various rescue groups had focused on finding ways to fund and increase law enforcement of abused and neglected animals, they would have retained the support of the majority. However, they apparently just wanted to convince the people that they were more noble and superior.

The money that they spent could have helped a great deal the various local shelters

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.