advertisement

House endorses birth record requirement for Missouri candidates

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 | 12:36 p.m. CDT

JEFFERSON CITY  — Birth records for presidential and vice presidential candidates would need to be publicly available for those appearing on Missouri ballots.

Political parties would be required to give the secretary of state's office proof of their candidates' identity and that they are natural born citizens of the U.S. Write-in presidential candidates also would need to provide documentation. The records would be open to the public.

Lawmakers endorsed the legislation Wednesday, and the measure needs another vote before moving to the Senate.

Sponsoring House member Lyle Rowland, a Republican from Cedarcreek, says the requirements are preventative and would give voters assurances that candidates are qualified.

Democratic critics said any concerns about a president's qualifications to hold office did not seem to arise until Barack Obama won election in 2008.

 


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Louis Schneebaum March 28, 2012 | 2:03 p.m.

Good to see Mr. Rowland is focused on the REAL important issues that the world faces.

(Report Comment)
Mark Foecking March 29, 2012 | 8:35 a.m.

Once again, our legislators solving problems that don't exist for their own pointless political posturing. I guess when they can't really do anything about the big porblems, they have to invent little ones.

DK

(Report Comment)
John Schultz March 29, 2012 | 10:52 a.m.

Mark, I wonder how election officials would handle such a hypothetical situation though. Not just for President, but for any federal candidate that doesn't meet the requirements spelled out in the Constitution. I can see state election authorities telling a candidate for US Senate or House that they don't meet the requirements and removing them from the ballot, but President is a bit of a special case since they are on more than one state's ballot.

(Report Comment)
frank christian March 29, 2012 | 11:31 a.m.

"Democratic critics said any concerns about a president's qualifications to hold office did not seem to arise until Barack Obama won election in 2008."

They sure got that right!

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements