WHAT OTHERS SAY: Veterans court bill deserves to pass

Wednesday, April 11, 2012 | 12:01 p.m. CDT

Does a proposal to establish a specialty court for military veterans have merit?

We believe so, but some caution must be considered.

The Missouri House of Representatives approved — on a 149-1 vote — and sent to the Senate a proposed bill by State Rep. Jay Barnes, R-Jefferson City, to create a veterans court.

Barnes' bill would allow “a circuit court to establish a veterans treatment court to dispose of criminal cases which stem from substance abuse or mental illness of military veterans or current military personnel.”

The concept is similar to specialty courts designed for drug and alcohol offenders. In Cole County and elsewhere in Missouri, these courts have demonstrated their worth by guiding defendants from addiction to recovery, rather than costly incarceration.

Barnes points out military veterans may suffer physical and mental disorders, including post-traumatic stress, as a result of their service. When those disorders lead to illegal activity, Barnes said, “We owe them the effort to get them help.”

In his February 2011 State of the Judiciary address while he still was chief justice, Supreme Court Judge William Ray Price Jr. urged the legislature to support the concept, saying: “From a moral, a fiscal and a law-and-order perspective, drug courts, DWI courts, juvenile diversion programs, veterans courts, re-entry courts and community supervision strategies are better investments of taxpayer money, for their target populations, than prisons.”

We believe Barnes’ proposal is not simply riding a wave of popular veterans issues; instead, it is worthy when judged on its own merits.

Military veterans who have served our nation, and suffer consequences as a result, deserve a fair chance to be healed.

Like a recovering addict, a veteran who is treated becomes a contributor, rather than a cost, to society.

A virtue of the legislation is it allows, but does not require, a circuit court to establish a specialty court for veterans. Courts will maintain the flexibility to base a decision on resources, caseload and other considerations.

A question that arises is: How many specialty courts will lawmakers try to establish and at what point does such specialization become counterproductive?

A veterans court does not move beyond the tipping point.

This legislation has potential to enable the judiciary to help military veterans continue their service in a civilian role.

Copyright Jefferson City News Tribune. Reprinted with permission.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.