New ethanol-gasoline blend to be sold in Midwest worries opponents

Friday, April 27, 2012 | 9:20 a.m. CDT

COLUMBIA — Gasoline with a higher percentage of ethanol will hit Midwest markets this summer, and Missouri has begun taking steps to make the blend available for certain vehicles.

Illinois, Iowa and Kansas, whose regulations on ethanol in gasoline are less stringent than Missouri's, will be first in the nation to offer E15, a blend of 15 percent ethanol and 85 percent gasoline.

Ethanol Facts

For ethanol blends E10, or gasohol (10 percent ethanol and 85 percent gasoline), and E85 (85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline):


  • Ethanol can be produced in large volumes domestically
  • E85 is cheaper in the Midwest compared to other regions of the country
  • The use of ethanol can reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil
  • It can also reduce greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere


  • Ethanol contains less energy than unblended gasoline
  • Vehicles operating on E10 usually experience a 3 to 4 percent drop in miles per gallon (MPG)
  • Flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs), which are specially designed to operate on E85 or any blend of ethanol and gasoline usually experience a 25 to 30 percent drop in miles per gallon (MPG)
  • Ethanol can be expensive to produce

Source: The most recent Fuel Economy Guide produced by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy

Related Articles

E15 can be used in flexible-fuel vehicles, which can operate on any combination of ethanol and gasoline, and non-flexible-fuel vehicles built in 2001 and later.

Before E15 is allowed for use in such vehicles in Missouri, however, a state rule must first be changed.

Today, nearly every gallon of fuel already contains 10 percent ethanol; the new rule would raise the permitted ethanol content to 15 percent.

On April 2, the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would allow biofuels producers to register as suppliers of E15. Twenty ethanol producers, many based in Midwestern states, have registered with the agency.

But opponents of the EPA decision are concerned it poorly addressed two critical issues that could threaten consumers and gas station owners’ pockets by approving the E15 blend.

“Equipment compatibility”

Ronald Leone, executive director of Missouri Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association, cited “equipment compatibility” as the first key issue.

Currently, gas pumps, tanks and piping equipment at fueling stations throughout Missouri are compatible with E10, the 10 percent ethanol and 90 percent gasoline blend that all auto manufacturers approve for their gasoline vehicles.

Most of the existing equipment at retail stations can handle only up to 10 percent ethanol because they were manufactured before the introduction of E15.

“We’re not going to put product into our tanks, into our pipes, out of our pump if it voids the warranty on our equipment and if it has the potential to let our equipment fail, which means gas will be leaking into the environment,” Leone said.

The EPA's solution is to set a requirement that underground tanks and above-ground equipment be compatible with E15 blends before it can be sold.

That means most retailers will need to convert existing equipment to E15-safe facilities once the state gives its go-ahead. Simultaneously, equipment manufacturers will need to approve the higher ethanol blend in their warranties.

Leone said a gas station could dish out about $100,000 to install new storage and dispensing equipment to meet EPA standards.

Potential to “misfuel” at the pumps

Some auto manufacturers have also asserted that without adequate testing, E15 could damage the engines of non-flexible fuel vehicles.

The EPA announced recently that it has performed necessary testing and approved E15 for 2001 model year and newer non-flex-fuel cars and light-duty trucks.

Because the new blend may only be used in those vehicles, it's possible that consumers driving pre-2001 models may mistakenly fill their tanks with the wrong fuel. 

The agency, in response, has proposed that gas stations be required to label pumps, but Leone worries that labels and warnings at the pumps may not be enough to prevent misfueling. He wants a federal or state law that unburdens gas stations of liability if a customer misfuels.

Until the EPA resolves these issues, Leone said he doesn't foresee his association's members selling the new blend at their stations.

Ross Mutrux, owner of Mutrux Automotive Sinclair at the intersection of West Rollins Road and Stadium Boulevard, said he won't sell E15 unless required by law.

"I think that we need a renewable fuel source, but E15, I don’t think is it," he said. "I just don’t agree that it’s the way we should go." 

Missouri’s 10 percent ethanol standard

In 2007, Missouri passed a law, which took effect in 2008, that made E10 the state standard. The law, also known as the Missouri Renewable Fuel Standard, requires retail stations to sell ethanol-blended fuel only when ethanol costs less than or the same as straight gasoline. The requirement exempts premium fuel.

Ronald Hayes, director of the Missouri Department of Agriculture's Weights, Measures & Consumer Protection Division, which regulates the state's fuel supply, said it isn't necessary to change this law but only modify a rule within the Code of State Regulations.

"Specifically, the regulation limiting total alcohol content at a 10 volume percent would need to be updated and standardized with new federal regulations," said Becky Frankenbach, director of communications at Missouri Corn Growers Association, which has been closely involved with E15 legislation.

She said the department is moving forward with this process, which Hayes said could take up to six months.

"We are closely following the progression of E15 and gathering input from stakeholders ... and others related to what is needed to implement E15 in Missouri," he said. "The department plans to address E15 in the very near future with a rule modification based on stakeholder input."

Until then, E15 won't be available for non-flex-fuel vehicles in Missouri, but E10 will remain an option.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Williams April 27, 2012 | 10:27 a.m.

Anyone know of a place I can purchase gasoline WITHOUT any ethanol?

For my small engines..........

(Report Comment)
Richard Saunders April 27, 2012 | 12:55 p.m.

Ethanol: Destroying engines while burning off the last few inches of our topsoil. It's waste and impoverishment all wrapped up in one package.

If not for the evil political class, this crime would not exist. This is nothing but even more corporate welfare for MFA et al.

And now it's only going to get worse.

(Report Comment)
Charlie Peters April 27, 2012 | 1:37 p.m.

Federal ethanol policy increases Government motors oil use and Big oil profit.

It is reported that today California is using Brazil sugar cane ethanol at $0.16 per gal increase over using GMO corn fuel ethanol. In this game the cars and trucks get to pay and Big oil profits are the result that may be ready for change.

We do NOT support AB 523 or SB 1396 unless the ethanol mandate is changed to voluntary ethanol in our gas.

Folks that pay more at the pump for less from Cars, trucks, food, water & air need better, it is time.

The car tax of AB 118 Nunez is just a simple Big oil welfare program, AAA questioned the policy and some folks still agree.

AB 523 & SB 1326 are just a short put (waiver) from better results.

GOOGLE: Prop 87 (510) 537-1796

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams April 27, 2012 | 2:00 p.m.

Who started this ethanol-from-grain push, anyway?

(Report Comment)
Cecil Caulkins April 28, 2012 | 5:41 a.m.

Ethanol reduces your car's mileage. It drives up the cost of food. It's hard to think of why the feds are so rabid to push more ethanol in gasoline.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.