advertisement

Missouri senators support firearms discrimination bill

Wednesday, April 18, 2012 | 9:49 a.m. CDT

JEFFERSON CITY — A Missouri Senate panel has endorsed legislation making it illegal for employers to discriminate against current or prospective workers who have concealed weapon permits or have used a legal firearm.

The measure would prohibit refusing to hire an applicant solely because the person has used a firearm for a legal purpose, such as self-defense.

Employers would also be prohibited from classifying job applicants differently based on whether they have a concealed carry permit or have used a gun in the past.

The Missouri House of Representatives passed the bill last month. The Senate's general laws committee approved it on a 12-0 vote Tuesday, sending it to the full Senate.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Jonathan Hopfenblatt April 18, 2012 | 3:56 p.m.

I wonder how many people have actually been discriminated against for owning/discharging/supporting the use of firearms. This bill looks like yet another complete waste of time and resources on the part of our legislature.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams April 18, 2012 | 5:52 p.m.

Jon: It's a "make hay while the sun shines" thingie.

We saw the same sort of thing 3.5 years ago.

The only difference is what one considers a waste of time and resources.

After all, some folks don't see this as a waste of time at all. They call it a "roadblock", aka "pre-emptive strike", to avoid what is almost certain further erosion.

In their eyes.

(Report Comment)
Jonathan Hopfenblatt April 19, 2012 | 2:44 a.m.

But this is the same thing as the new bill forcing employers to provide contraception coverage, except it goes the other direction (i.e. making conservatives happy and liberals unhappy). Both are a waste of time and resources, nevermind that the same criticism can be levied against this bill just as has been done for the healthcare one, with the "war on religion" nonsense.

Why should I be forced to hire (or keep employed) a gun nut if I REALLY believe that guns are the worst thing ever? Why do that guy's beliefs trump mine?

(And no, I don't care about the 2nd Amendment either way, as I've said plenty of times before. I'm just illustrating the point.)

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements