GEORGE KENNEDY: Westwood tree issue classic Columbia story

Thursday, May 3, 2012 | 1:11 p.m. CDT; updated 7:41 p.m. CDT, Thursday, May 3, 2012

One of the many delights of living in the Old Southwest neighborhood, as I do, is the trees. We’re shaded, protected, calmed. Joyce Kilmer might have had our neighborhood in mind when he wrote that little poem.

On Westwood Avenue, my street, there are fewer sweet gums today than this time last week. You’ve probably read about what some call a controversy, but that I prefer to think of an exercise in grass-roots — or maybe I should say tree roots — democracy.

It's a classic Columbia story, a tale of neighborhood activism and government responsiveness, with a bit of miscommunication and a hint of paranoia for seasoning.

Along with its no-longer-so-prevalent sweet gums, Westwood is lined with academics along with a few physicians and lawyers, people with the ability and inclination to speak their minds.

So when the neighbor at one end of my block learned on a recent weekend that a city contractor planned to start cutting trees the following Monday, it's no surprise that protest erupted. The alarm went door to door and then to the always-receptive Barbara Hoppe, who represents progressive preservation as well as her Sixth Ward.

The would-be cutters still showed up Monday and were quickly sent on their way. (The foreman of the crew, glancing a little apprehensively over his shoulder in the direction of our lead protester, told me, "That lady said she'd sue me.")

There was no lawsuit, but the neighbor at the other end of the block whose innocent proposal to have the trees in front of his own house removed had drawn the city arborist’s attention to us felt compelled to compose a lengthy emailed defense and explanation. Angst, even anger — though not yet chainsaw exhaust — was in the air.

Then came a neighborhood meeting, followed by another, that one attended by the city directors of Planning and Public Works, the city arborist and two Council members. Apology, explanation, compromise.

The apology was for the failure of communication about the planned removals. The explanation covered the now-obvious unsuitability of the sweet gum as a streetside tree. The late Henry Bent, an earlier generation’s tree loving academic but a chemist rather than a botanist, envisioned the forest cover we enjoy. He just failed to imagine that the trees he planted 70 years ago would send their surface roots destructively under sidewalks and through curbs.

The compromise reduced the deforestation and hinted, at least, at the possibility of city-financed street and sidewalk repair to come. The City Council will consider at Monday’s meeting whether to direct some of the leftover money in the snow removal budget to fixing Westwood.

Another important compromise was a promise to explore alternatives to the standard concrete sidewalks in an effort to save some trees.

Our Missourian’s report of that session also broke the news of a $10,000 study of the trees in the whole Old Southwest, from Stadium to Broadway west of Providence. That study, just completed and due to be posted shortly on the city website, examined the health of and the possible risks posed by the more than 2,000 trees we mainly cherish.

And the paranoia? Hank Ottinger, president of our neighborhood association, got an email from one neighbor who saw in this episode evidence of a City Hall conspiracy to denude the Fourth Ward in revenge for our troublesome activism. We may not be universally beloved, but that’s just not believable.

What is believable, though, and what this tale reminds us, is that Columbia is in serious need of a more strongly preservationist tree policy. As the Imagine Columbia process continues, let’s not only imagine but enact reasonable and enforceable rules to protect and extend Henry Bent’s vision.

Just without the sweet gums.

George Kennedy is a former managing editor at the Missourian and professor emeritus at the Missouri School of Journalism. Questions? Contact Opinion editor Elizabeth Conner.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Williams May 3, 2012 | 2:04 p.m.

'Tis true, lack of communication was the first "event". It shouldn't have happened this way. Neighbors should have been informed in advance, even if the city owned the right of way.

I love big trees, too....heck, I love trees, not just the big ones. That's why I've planted 1000 of them, AND killed/cut probably 1000 others in an effort to improve my forested areas (Columbia could use a LOT of forest stand improvement (FSI or TSI, look it up), but would never the misfortune of its forested areas, which could be sooooo much better than Columbia allows them to be).

Let's not forget, tho, that someone a long time ago had the vision to plant those trees in your neighborhood, and now they are big and you've had a great run. Now those trees are getting old (like you), so I ask this: What are YOU going to leave those who come after you?

Dead/dying old trees?

So, in your efforts to enjoy the beauty and comforts of your current environment, don't forget your legacy to those that follow. That "strongly preservationist tree policy" of yours smacks of selfishness.

Fact: Big trees are much closer to death than birth.

For me, I'm contemplating taking down 3 trees in my front yard, all 30+" thick oaks. Their trunks are solid so far as I can tell and should make some really nice furniture. We've had a great 24 year run with these trees, and they are about to start showing their age. I'll plant new ones for whoever comes next, and they can watch them grow.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams May 3, 2012 | 2:12 p.m.

Many folks think Columbia's forests are, and should remain, "natural".

They aren't "natural" at all and haven't been for a very long time.

Firing the forest floor is now taboo. The balance of tree types is out-of-whack, and the forest floors are a mess of vegetation usually controlled by periodic firing. Where is the understory of young oaks, hickories, walnuts, and pecans that will replace the old parents as they die?

(Report Comment)
Matt McGrath May 3, 2012 | 9:22 p.m.

There are plenty of younger trees in the Old SW and on Westwood, as well as mature ones. There's nothing selfish about wanting to save healthy mature trees nor about wanting to increase their longevity.

Agreed, it would be nice to hear from the city arborist about plans to plant new suitable species after eliminating so many trees in the stretch of one block. I hope the Missourian keeps tabs on the city arborist and his plans for the trees in the Old SW.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams May 3, 2012 | 10:18 p.m.

Matt: Hanging onto a HEALTHY older tree is an OK thing.

Hanging onto a tree showing, or starting to show, it's age (more dead limbs each year, hollow, holes, chronically stressed leaves, insects, disease, etc.) is selfish to those who come after.

Not much you can do to change the lifetime of a tree. A few things, ...but not many. Far less than physicians can do for you.

Better to harvest the solid trunk while it's still solid and make something for the neighborhood.

PS: The soil around these trees is undoubtedly highly compacted. I don't think this is correctable and is highly adverse to trees; that's one huge reason you don't mix valuable timber with livestock. A walkway around the trees isn't gonna help do much of anything good for the tree. Might help the citizens, but not the tree.

Harvest, then plant dictated by the tree, not human emotion or wishes.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.