Columbia City Council passes ordinance to create new EEZ board

Monday, May 21, 2012 | 11:04 p.m. CDT; updated 12:18 p.m. CDT, Thursday, May 24, 2012
Opponents of an enhanced enterprise zone objected to an ordinance re-establishing an EEZ board at Monday's Columbia City Council meeting.

This story has been updated to reflect the official appointments and terms of Columbia residents appointed by Mayor Bob McDavid to the new Enhanced Enterprise Advisory Board.

COLUMBIA — A diverse group of demonstrators gathered in front of the Daniel Boone City Building on Monday to speak out against the enhanced enterprise zone and its related finding of blight.

Among the throng of protesters gathered around a sign proclaiming "FIGHT THE BLIGHT," David Dollens, a 40-year resident of Columbia, said he believes the EEZ will negatively impact the poor and take taxes away from services like schools and transportation. 

"It's going to eat the poor up," Dollens said. He asserted that Mayor Bob McDavid would not pick anyone who would represent the people most affected by blight. 

Inside, after a two-hour public hearing, the Columbia City Council unanimously voted Monday to pass an ordinance that will re-establish the Enhanced Enterprise Zone Board. The board will replace a previous one the council dissolved earlier this month.

The new board will consist of seven members: one appointed by the Columbia Public School District, one by the taxing districts within the EEZ and five chosen by the mayor.

McDavid said Monday before the public hearing that if the board were approved he would reappoint Randy Morrow, John Strotbeck and Louis Gatewood.

He also said he would appoint attorney Jeremy Root. A member of Citizens Involved and Invested in Columbia, Root has to date been an ardent opponent of the EEZ blight decree. He was recommended by council members Daryl Dudley and Helen Anthony of the Fourth and Fifth wards, respectively.

McDavid also said he would appoint Anthony Stanton, whom First Ward Councilman Fred Schmidt and Douglass Neighborhood Association President Tyree Byndom suggested.

Those appointments became official when the council re-established the board.

Toward the end of the meeting, City Clerk Sheela Amin asked for clarification on how long each of the mayor's appointees would serve on the board. State law requires that those terms be staggered.

McDavid appointed Strotbeck and Stanton to four-year terms, Root and Morrow to three-year terms and Gatewood to a two-year term.

The new board will be charged with advising the council on zone boundaries, reviewing applications to join the EEZ and monitoring business activity within the zone.

Hoppe expressed hope Monday that the new board would produce much narrower boundaries for the proposed zone.

The original resolution marked 60 percent of the city as blighted, a contentious categorization that led to opposition from Columbia residents. Many said they felt that blight would lead to decreased property values, an eroded tax base and eminent domain abuse

Mary Hussmann, a member of Grass Roots Organizing, spoke during the meeting about the council's role in the city. 

"Your job is not to build walls but bridges," she said. "The blight/EEZ plan not only damages the reputation of Columbia, but is unfair and costly to the residents of Columbia.”  

Keep Columbia Free, a political action committee, announced a plan Friday to circulate a petition to recall the council members who voted in favor of the ordinance and another to put an initiative on the next ballot to rescind it. 

The group, said member Mitch Richards, will begin gathering signatures immediately despite the unanimous vote. 

"Tomorrow's another day," he said. 

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Dave Overfelt May 22, 2012 | 7:57 a.m.

YES, perfect! Because when elected officials can't come to a decision, surely punting it to another board or commission can solve the problem. Have we made it to 60 boards and commissions yet?

(Report Comment)
David Sautner May 22, 2012 | 1:01 p.m.

I thought that the passage of an ordinance meant that there would be at least three more City Council meetings and a Town Hall meeting. Well?

"City ordinances require multiple readings and opportunities for public input, whereas resolutions do not."

(Report Comment)
John Schultz May 22, 2012 | 3:37 p.m.

Ordinances usually appear on the city council's agenda for two meetings. Basically the first appearance is to let people know about it prior to the actual meeting at which it will be voted and includes a link on the city's website of the ordinance language. The vote then occurs at the next scheduled meeting unless the council removes it from the agenda.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz May 22, 2012 | 3:43 p.m.

Here's a link to the upcoming agenda:

Anything the council will be voting on is under old business. The consent agenda are itty-bitty matters that are voted on en masse. Items under first reading are usually under old business at the following council meeting.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.