advertisement

WHAT OTHERS SAY: Ruling should give lawmakers impetus to rewrite criminal code

Tuesday, June 5, 2012 | 5:42 p.m. CDT

After 13-year-old Megan Meier of Dardenne Prairie killed herself in 2007, Missouri lawmakers reacted the way they frequently do following a high-profile tragedy.

They passed a broad anti-stalking, anti-harassment law aimed at the kind of abuse that directly contributed to Megan's death. In her case, she was overcome with grief after finding out that her Myspace crush wasn't real but a cruel joke.

Last week, the Missouri Supreme Court struck down part of what was called "Megan's law." The ruling came in a case involving a man who had entered his ex-wife's home illegally and had made unwanted phone calls to her. The court ruled that the law was overly broad.

The sponsor of the law, Sen. Scott Rupp, R-Wentzville, said lawmakers probably will go back to the drawing board.

What Mr. Rupp and his colleagues should do instead is use the court's decision as an impetus to make certain that next year's legislature adopts a streamlined criminal code.

There are countless examples of legislative overreach to crimes that tug on our emotions. They've clogged up the justice system for more than 30 years, the last time the code was rewritten. A committee of prosecutors, public defenders, judges and lawmakers already has done the heavy lifting, working with the Missouri Bar over the past few years to suggest many changes.

Most of those changes were incorporated into a bill filed this year by Sen. Jolie Justus, D-Kansas City. The legislature failed to give the bill serious consideration, deciding instead to appoint a committee to study the issue. That committee's report is due in November.

The bipartisan committee should recommend that the new code be adopted by next year's legislature. Doing it this year would have given an added boost to the bill lawmakers passed as a result of a Pew Center study that recommended reducing the state's prison population. Much like the Pew recommendations, the criminal code changes would seek to keep the truly dangerous criminals locked up and decrease sentences for some lesser crimes.

A rewritten criminal code should offer clarity to prosecutors and judges as to which crimes to charge, and it should make sure that the sentence fits the crime. There are too many contradictions in the code based on legislative overreactions to crimes such as the one involving Megan Meier's harassers.

Among the practical changes needed is a reduction in the number of crimes that qualify the indigent to be represented by a public defender. The state's public defender offices are stretched so thin that they've been threatening to refuse to take cases. Part of the problem is a code that puts their focus on minor cases that, in most cases, shouldn't involve prison time.

Politically, passing a bill that streamlines the criminal code won't be easy. It will involve lawmakers showing restraint, rather than putting another meaningless, and sometimes counterproductive, "tough on crime" notch in their belts. Lawmakers will have to resist the temptation to overreact to the next high-profile crime.

All elements of Missouri's judicial system recognize the need for a criminal code rewrite. That should give lawmakers all the political cover they need.

Copyright St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Reprinted with permission.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Dan Viets June 7, 2012 | 3:34 p.m.

I applaud the St. Louis Post for urging action to reform or, as described in the recent editorial, “streamline” the Missouri criminal code. I have worked with a committee of prosecutors and criminal defense lawyers on the massive proposal to rewrite the criminal code during the past couple of years.

I am however concerned when I see frequent references to such committees including “. . . prosecutors, public defenders, judges and lawmakers . . .”. The missing constituency here is private criminal defense attorneys. In fact, in this instance, several private criminal defense attorneys gave of their time, without compensation, to work with this group. Unlike the prosecutors and the public defenders, the private defense attorneys are not “on the clock” when they devote their time to this kind of work. I am concerned that private criminal defense attorneys are often excluded from such bodies, as if we did not exist or as if we were not interested in participating in the drafting of public policy. Nothing can be further from the truth.

I ask that you bear in mind that private criminal defense attorneys are an important part of the criminal justice system. Indeed, the system could not function without us. The Missouri Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers includes both public and private defense attorneys from throughout our State. I am a Past President and current Board member of the MACDL. I urge you to contact us at any time if you are seeking the perspective of seasoned, professional criminal defense attorneys.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Dan Viets

DV: sas

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements