UPDATE: Missouri seeks stadium expansion for SEC move

Monday, June 25, 2012 | 8:01 p.m. CDT; updated 9:19 p.m. CDT, Monday, June 25, 2012
Memorial Stadium sits empty Monday at the corner of Stadium and Providence. New additions have been proposed to prepare for Missouri's move to the Southeastern Conference.

COLUMBIA — Missouri has unveiled its long-promised plans to upgrade athletic facilities as it moves to the Southeastern Conference.

An athletics master plan released by the school Monday calls for adding at least 6,000 seats at Memorial Stadium, which currently has a capacity of 71,004.  The expansion would consist of 5,200 bleacher seats on the stadium's east side and 800 to 900 premium seats, along with new restrooms, lounges and concession stands.

Even with the addition, Missouri would still rank ninth in stadium size among the 14 SEC schools. Eight of those schools have stadiums that hold at least 80,000, with Bryant-Denny Stadium at Alabama and Tennessee's Neyland Stadium topping 100,000.

Missouri also wants to add more enclosed luxury suites on the stadium's west side and expand a concourse at the stadium's north entrance that would provide room for another possible seating increase in the future.

The school is also seeking to improve its tennis and golf facilities as well as its softball and baseball stadiums. The projects would cost $72 million in 30-year debt financing through revenue bonds, although a plan summary suggests Missouri would recoup its entire investment through the sale of additional premium seats and luxury boxes.

Missouri athletics director Mike Alden will present the proposal to university curators Tuesday afternoon, with a vote expected Wednesday morning. He declined an Associated Press interview request Monday through a school spokesman.

Immediately after the Tuesday curators' session, Alden plans to announce what's described as "major private gift" to Missouri athletics. He has consistently spoken of the need for donors to "step up" from the moment Missouri's move to the SEC from the Big 12 Conference was announced in November 2011.

Missouri ranks near the bottom of its new conference in terms of annual expenses on athletics, as well as athletics revenue and recruiting budgets.

The plan summary provided to curators suggests that the increased investment on athletics is also an SEC expectation.

"With the move to the Southeastern Conference, this planning effort evaluated all facilities and identified those requiring immediate attention to accommodate the expectations of the new conference home," the master plan reads.

The timing of the debt financing request could prove awkward for the seven curators, who are political appointees selected by the governor and approved by Missouri legislators.

Supporters of the University of Missouri Press — which is slated to shut down this week after administrators said they can no longer afford the publishing house's $400,000 annual subsidy — plan to protest the budget cut at the curators' meeting on the Columbia campus.

They have criticized the move by new Missouri system president Tim Wolfe and compared the relatively modest budget cut to the millions spent on football and men's basketball, although academic funds are separate from athletic budgets.

While the bulk of the proposed stadium expansion would come be paid for through revenue bonds, the plan also calls for the use of $500,000 from a campus facilities reserve fund that covers utility infrastructure improvements.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Ellis Smith June 26, 2012 | 4:55 a.m.

The lunatics really have taken over the asylum, and I'm not talking about those persons who support restoring the academic press.

Far more is at stake here than the fate of the press; it's a matter of WHO REALLY RUNS MU, our System's "flagship campus."

PS: Are there no other situations on the MU campus in need of "utility infrastructure improvements"? There aren't? Well my goodness, MU must be unique in American public higher education.

(Report Comment)
Mitchell Moore June 26, 2012 | 9:34 a.m.

Like it or not, the football team and basketball team are MU's best public relations tools. The enrollment increase of 10,000 students in the past 10 years has more to do with having a winning football team than anything else. How many instructors in the College of Arts and Sciences owe their jobs to the Athletic Department?

In addition, the Athletic Department is self of the few major college sports programs that takes practically nothing from the general fund.

MU's campus facilities are great. We are in a golden age. Whether MU will lose students to online-programs offering top-notch professors at one-tenth the cost is a few years away. For now, enjoy the view from the top.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith June 26, 2012 | 12:44 p.m.

Then I suppose we should shed a tear for these institutions of higher learning:

California Institute of Technology
Johns Hopkins University
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
University of Chicago*

How can they possibly attract students when they all field NCAA Division III teams? Why would anyone attend them? What is Division III? No athletic scholarships.

Well they do have at least two other commonalities: Each is widely considered to be among not just America's top institutions of learning but also the World's top institutions. Also, all are private.

Maybe it's true: Podunk State University may well require Division I football and basketball in order to reel in students.

On a PERCENTAGE basis the fastest growing campus in UM System has not been MU. The campus in question is now maxed out. All it took to get the spurt was a name change (with "University of Missouri" left out of the new name).

*- The first ever Heisman Trophy winner (Jay Berwanger) played for University of Chicago, which subsequently abandoned big time athletics. U. of C. knows what business it's in.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.