Missouri GOP pans Medicaid expansion, waits on exchange

Thursday, June 28, 2012 | 7:05 p.m. CDT; updated 9:20 p.m. CDT, Thursday, June 28, 2012

JEFFERSON CITY — After the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the federal health care law Thursday, Missouri Republican leaders closed the door on expanding Medicaid eligibility while taking a wait-and-see approach for a state-based online insurance marketplace.

The high court upheld the closely-watched individual insurance mandate that will require most Americans to obtain insurance or face a penalty. However, the Supreme Court struck down part of the law that would have threatened Missouri and other states with the loss of federal Medicaid dollars if they refused to expand coverage to adults earning up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level.

Now Missouri officials face two questions: Should the state voluntarily expand Medicaid to cover more people who earn more money? And should Missouri create a state-based insurance exchange or use one that will be run by the federal government?

Immediately after the court's ruling, Missouri Republicans said expanding Medicaid would be unlikely and too expensive. Missouri sharply trimmed its Medicaid rolls in 2005 while facing state budget difficulties. The expansion in Missouri would cover an additional 255,000 adults, but it would cost the state $100 million or more each year starting in 2017.

Republican Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder said the Medicaid expansion would have been "a break-the-bank provision for the state of Missouri." Kinder, who in 2010 filed his own, separate legal challenge to the federal health care law, pledged Thursday to continue fighting.

Nonetheless, some advocates said expanding eligibility for Medicaid would help. Missouri Health Advocacy Alliance Executive Director Andrea Routh said the coalition of mostly consumer groups and health care providers would push for coverage of more people.

"It's really important that that Medicaid piece be implemented in Missouri. It's really designed to give those low-income families coverage in a way that is organized and we can track the spending," Routh said.

Missouri had about 835,000 uninsured residents in 2010 – about 14 percent of the population, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon made expanding eligibility for the state's Medicaid rolls a major theme of his 2008 election bid, but he declined to comment about it Thursday. Instead, Nixon said his administration is reviewing the high court's ruling and that he is "committed to working collaboratively with citizens, businesses, medical providers and the legislature to move forward in a way that works best for families in our state."

Besides Medicaid, state officials also will confront whether to develop a state-based exchange that would allow people to comparison shop online for insurance. The federal government would run exchanges starting in 2014 for states that do not develop their own.

Missouri received a $1 million planning grant and was awarded a $20.8 million federal grant to prepare for its own insurance exchange. Officials spent the planning grant and $1.3 million from the other federal grant, but work ground to a halt amid opposition from the Republican-led legislature.

House and Senate leaders said Thursday they preferred waiting until the outcome of this year's elections before launching into a state-based exchange.

Missouri voters will decide this fall on a measure that would allow a state-created insurance exchange only if it is specifically authorized by a state law or a subsequent vote of the people. It would prohibit the governor or any executive branch officials from taking any steps toward establishing an exchange on their own. House Majority Leader Tim Jones added that if Republican Mitt Romney defeats Democratic President Barack Obama, he believes Romney would suspend the requirement to have health insurance exchanges in each state.

"I wouldn't want to waste a lot of legislative time and state resources right now, setting up something — or talking about setting up something — which may become completely unnecessary in November," said Jones, R-Eureka.

Other lawmakers were more forceful.

Sen. Scott Rupp, R-Wentzville, said Missouri had decided not to move forward an exchange to not "build the building blocks of Obamacare in the state."

Rep. Chris Moldendorp said legislative leaders should immediately appoint a committee to study a health insurance exchange and approve the creation of one in January. Molendorp, a Republican, operates an insurance agency in Raymore and sponsored legislation to establish a state insurance exchange in 2011.

"Exercising your last shred of sovereignty, exercising states' rights to control their marketplace — that is a conservative, prudent, responsible action by a citizen legislator," he said.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Elizabeth Conner Stephens June 28, 2012 | 11:41 p.m.

In reference to a question on this story, the eligibility requirements for Medicaid programs is available here:

Elizabeth Conner
Missourian news editor

(Report Comment)
Louis Schneebaum June 29, 2012 | 12:45 a.m.

"exercising states' rights" -- Been hearing this line since I fought at Gettysburg. I'm sick of hearing it, you lost.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith June 29, 2012 | 2:35 a.m.

@Louis Schneebaum:

Well dat do clear up somethin'. You must have been the damned Yankee we shot who waz tryin' to steal our boiled peanuts. Served you right! You can boo when we sing "Dixie, "an' you can even tread on de glorious Confederate Flag, but you cannot attempt to steal Southern cuisine.

An' you'd better learn to cherish dat cuisine too, 'cause you is now in de Conference! What Conference? There IS only one Conference! Silly Missourians, callin' yourselves "tigers." We already had TWO universities with de name "tigers" before anyone down here ever heard of you. Is Missouri located north or South of Montana? Is it near Las Vegas? Ain't in Canada, is it? We don't allow no foreign universities, you know. De name "Tigers" is as common as grass. Do you suppose dem Princeton "tigers" would join de Conference too? Probably not. Damned uppity Yankees!

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams June 29, 2012 | 9:10 a.m.

LouisS: "exercising states' rights" -- Been hearing this line since I fought at Gettysburg. I'm sick of hearing it, you lost."

And yet another person announces they have not read the decision and, therefore, speaks from the perspective of playground ignorance.

I remain in awe that Justice Roberts actually got the remaining 4 to get past their gagging to go along with his vision of Federalism.

While my sympathies do tend towards the dissent by Scalia et. al., I'm quite satisfied with the Roberts decision and the future vision it entails about things I hold dear.

My satisfaction with this should worry you sufficiently to go read the thing. Try not to gag too much.

(Report Comment)
Christopher Foote June 29, 2012 | 10:18 a.m.

And Philadelphia, Mississippi is a wonderful sleepy little town to kick off your post-convention presidential run and expound upon the majesty of state's rights over those meddling federal ones. I wonder if anything bad ever happened there...probably not to Mr. Ellis Smith.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith June 29, 2012 | 1:27 p.m.

Christopher Foote:

If you like Mississippi towns I recommend Holly Springs. When it was occupied during the War Between the States (and Tiger types better get used to it being called that) the Union general said it was too pretty to burn, and he didn't burn it. Have any of you attended the various "pilgrimage weeks" in the deep South? Home and garden tours, beginning on the Gulf Coast and working northward. I recall one house in Holly Springs where they had a fantastic porcelain doll collection (heads, lower arms, feet) clothed in period clothing (c.1880).

Please don't tread on the azaleas.

When were you last in Philadelphia, Mississippi?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.