Columbia council approves annexation, rezoning of Peppers Nightclub property

Monday, July 16, 2012 | 9:47 p.m. CDT; updated 11:44 p.m. CDT, Monday, July 16, 2012

COLUMBIA — A unanimous vote from the Columbia City Council helped usher in the annexation and rezoning of the former Peppers Nightclub property Monday evening.

The property at 4515 N. Highway 763 will now be zoned C-P, planned commercial zoning. It was previously zoned as C-G, general business, and R-S, single-family residential.

Property owner Karon Rowe had originally requested annexation in May. On July 5, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously to approve the request for rezoning and annexation, according to previous Missourian reports.

The approval of zoning and annexation came with the following use restrictions that were suggested by the commission in its report to the council:

  • None of the structures can be occupied or used until the sewer is connected to the city’s sewer system and all buildings meet Columbia building code.
  • The mobile home on the north side of the site will be removed from the property if disconnected from public utilities for 30 days.
  • Parking, loading and drive areas must meet city zoning ordinances before structures are used.
  • The structure at the south end of the property cannot be used for commercial purposes.

The city denied the request from Rowe for the requirement of landscaping or screening barriers to be waived.

The council limited the types of businesses that can be opened on the property based on recommendations in the staff report and by the Columbia police and fire departments. In the future, the property cannot have alcohol sales, child care facilities, restaurants or cabarets. 


During public comment on the issue, attorney Robert Hollis, representing Rowe, asked the council to consider the property and not the property owner in placing restrictions.

Hollis said there are plenty of ordinances and codes to remedy problems rather than using zoning restrictions.

However, Fifth Ward Councilwoman Helen Anthony said the “property has been a public nuisance” and felt the council had an obligation from a public safety perspective to vote according to the commission and staff recommendations.


Supervising editor is Ted Hart.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.