You are viewing the print version of this article. Click here to view the full version.
Columbia Missourian

Columbia rally sparks debate over women's issues

By Hilary Niles
August 23, 2012 | 11:08 p.m. CDT
A crowd of about 120 Planned Parenthood supporters gathered Thursday for a rally in Columbia.

COLUMBIA — A blond woman going by “Pillamina” and donning a birth control dispenser costume led a rally of pink-clad women and men holding signs that said “Women Are Watching” outside Rep. Mary Still's campaign office Thursday evening.

“When women vote, Democrats win,” Still said with a smile — and to great applause. A crowd of about 120 supporters had come out to hear her and others speak as part of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund’s “Women Are Watching” bus tour, of which Pillamina was the ringleader.

Context about rape and pregnancy

The Missourian has compiled a closer look at rape laws and statistics, both nationally and in Missouri.

Links to articles on other websites address sexual assault and the science and beliefs behind pregnancy resulting from rape.



Related Articles

The women’s health organization’s 11-state bus tour had been announced before Rep. Todd Akin’s controversial remarks on pregnancy and rape. Akin’s comments have catalyzed abortion and women’s health — issues that were significant considerations for many voters — into a lightning rod on the national campaign trail.

In Boone County, Still is seizing that fire as fuel in her bid to replace Republican Kurt Schaefer in his 19th District seat in the Missouri Senate.

Still said in an interview earlier Thursday that Akin’s comments were “a window into the views of the far-right fringe … very prominent in the (Missouri) House and Senate.”

“Todd Akin’s idiocy is a very convenient diversion for Rep. Still,” Schaefer said Thursday before Still's rally.

The crowd at Thursday’s rally — a solid majority wearing pink T-shirts with the “Women Are Watching” logo and holding matching signs — was a mix of mostly women and some men of many ages.

Schaefer accused Still of riding the wave of Akin’s controversy to divert attention away from her lack of leadership.

“We need to focus on economic development, job creation, public education funding, all those things I have been working so hard on for four years in the time that Mary Still has done nothing,” he said.

But Still said Akin’s comments have focused attention on an issue that some would rather avoid. She said Schaefer doesn’t want to talk about women’s health because he has a record of not standing up for women and that he doesn’t understand women’s health as a fiscal policy issue.

“The ability to plan your family provides you an opportunity to provide for your children in a way that will ensure that they have a better future,” Still said. “And certainly, reproduction” — including the option for a woman to choose abortion — “is a health issue for women as well. ... Access to contraception and emergency contraception prevents abortion,” she said.

But the difference between Still’s and Schaefer’s positions on birth control can be hard to find.

“Birth control is a medical issue and none of the government’s business,” Schaefer said. Access to family planning and contraception for both men and women is “an important part of anyone raising a family,” he said. "I absolutely agree with her on that."

After hearing that Still had accused him of not standing up for women, Schaefer vigorously refuted the charge. He pointed to restored funding for emergency room rape kits and domestic violence shelters, protections for rape victims who become pregnant, and $8 million in funding for smoking cessation programs for pregnant Medicaid recipients as part of his record in defense of women.

There will be time before Sept. 12 for them to hash out their credentials for local women's votes. Senate Bill 749, which would allow insurance companies to deny access to birth control for certain employees, comes up for a possible veto override that day. Both Still and Schaefer voted against the legislation, which passed nonetheless but was vetoed by Gov. Jay Nixon.

Supervising editor is Scott Swafford.