WHAT OTHERS SAY: Payday loan ballot proposal defeat shows influence of money

Thursday, September 6, 2012 | 11:44 a.m. CDT

The payday loan industry didn’t want to argue its case to Missouri voters. So it pulled out all the stops to keep an initiative to cap interest rates off of the November ballot. Sadly, it has succeeded.

Industry operatives falsely told churches they could lose their tax-exempt status if they educated parishioners about the exploitative nature of payday loans. Thugs harassed citizens as they gathered voters’ signatures.

Bankrolled with $2.3 million in secret money, supporters of annual interest rates that on average exceed 400 percent threw up one legal hurdle after another.

After losing their early skirmishes, payday loan supporters rejoiced when Secretary of State Robin Carnahan announced that the measure couldn’t appear on the November ballot because too many voters’ signatures were invalid. The industry sent its lawyers back to court to prevent its opponents from proving otherwise.

And so it ends. The grass-roots coalition known as Missourians for Responsible Lending has announced it is out of time to jump through the legal hoops required to prove legitimate registered voters signed its petitions.

Voters will not have their say on payday loan restrictions in November.

The collapse of the payday loan initiative took down another worthy initiative attempt. The coalition attempting to cap interest rates on payday loans had worked hand-in-hand with Give Missourians a Raise, the group seeking a dollar raise in Missouri’s minimum wage. That initiative won’t appear on the November ballot, either.

Opponents had good cause to fear the will of voters on both these matters.

Caps on the interest rates that can be charged by payday lenders have passed by solid margins in other states. Three-quarters of Missouri voters in 2006 said “yes” to a ballot initiative to raise the minimum wage and there is little evidence that support has fallen much since then.

The demise of the two initiatives tells a disturbing story about the influence of money in Missouri politics.

Supporters of reasonable restrictions on payday lending have been rebuffed for years in the state legislature.

A study released a few months ago by Public Campaign, a watchdog group, showed why. Payday lenders and their lobbyists gave more than $1.6 million to top legislative leaders in Missouri over the past decade.

Missouri has now seen the initiative petition process corrupted by the same interests which dole out campaign cash to legislators.

Supporters of the payday loan industry hid their financial backing by donating to a non-profit organization called Missourians for Responsible Government. Founded by Kansas City communications consultant Patrick Tuoey, this entity acts as a conduit for people who want to donate anonymously to certain political causes. It passed money along to a campaign committee, Missourians for Equal Credit Opportunity.

Records with the ethics commission show that Missourians for Equal Credit Opportunity doled out hefty sums to, among others, consultant Jeff Roe’s firm, Axiom Strategies; to the politically connected law firm Graves, Bartle, Marcus & Garrett; and to a Las Vegas firm that specializes in petition drives, Silver Bullet Group. Chuck Hatfield, a well-connected lawyer in Jefferson City, also worked to keep the initiatives off the ballot.

So, for now, workers in Missouri will see no raise in the minimum wage and no protections against exorbitant interest rates charged by the state’s ubiquitous payday lenders.

For the lawyers, consultants and others, it’s payday as always — this time at the expense of democracy.

Copyright The Kansas City Star. Reprinted with permission. Questions? Contact Opinion editor Elizabeth Conner.


Read more here:

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Charles leverett September 6, 2012 | 1:08 p.m.

Yep, when we don't get our way, always blame big money, always someone else fault.

(Report Comment)
Kevin Gamble September 6, 2012 | 2:31 p.m.

Charles, you have an interesting definition of "not getting our way." This was clearly a case of sabotage - a series of legal challenges designed to take just long enough to scuttle the measure's appearance on the ballot.

The groups promoting this ballot measure weren't trying to "get their way" - they were trying to allow the people of this state to have their say, yea or nay, on the topic. Your right to vote on this issue has been taken away by the "big money" you defend, and you seem strangely okay with that.

(Report Comment)
Charles leverett September 6, 2012 | 2:45 p.m.

Actually what I see is people didn't get enough signatures, so they couldn't make the ballot. I'm sorry it happens, when it happens to the "other side" it's justice, when it happens to your side then a big money conspiracy.

(Report Comment)
Skip Yates September 6, 2012 | 10:46 p.m.

Influence of the payday loan folks or of the banks, who want you to have a credit card....?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.