COLUMBIA — The exterior of the historic Heibel-March building is unkempt, but it retains some charm. Its slanted entrance at the corner of Range Line Street and Wilkes Boulevard hints at its past as a drug store and community landmark.
Inside, broken glass, old blankets, bent nails, crumbled concrete and fast food wrappers are strewn about. Clusters of graffiti mar the walls.
In May, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended tearing down the city-owned building, but the Columbia City Council passed a motion to seek proposals from developers to restore it. The city's Purchasing Office set an Aug. 31 deadline for proposals, which passed without any submissions.
The city choose to extend the deadline to Sept. 21 because two local organizations say they are interested in the building but "messed up" and missed the deadline, Parks and Recreation Director Mike Hood told the council at its meeting Monday.
Grove Construction General Contracting Co. and another group of individuals are interested in submitting proposals, Hood said in a phone interview.
Despite extending the proposal deadline, council members are not optimistic about the building's future.
"At some point in time, we're going to have to pull the plug on this and say that's it," said Third Ward Councilman Gary Kespohl.
First Ward Councilman Fred Schmidt agreed, but he also emphasized its historical value.
"Once the past is gone, it's G.O.N.E.," Schmidt said.
The Heibel-March building was constructed in the 1930s as a drugstore and later became a grocery store. Its last tenant, an auto parts store, left the building about 15 years ago.
The city purchased the building in 1998 for $150,000, planning to make it part of the adjacent Field Park, according to a previous Missourian report.
In 2000, the city sold the building to Central Missouri Community Action for $10 under the condition that the organization would restore it within five years. In 2008, after three one-year extensions to the agreement, the organization gave the property back to the city after deciding it couldn't complete the project, Hood said.
The Historic Preservation Commission listed the building as a notable historic property in 2005.
Hood believes that the high costs associated with renovating the building are keeping developers away.
A buyer would have to pay to bring the building up to code and to restore and maintain the historical exterior. There would also be costs for upgrading utilities and fees for reconnecting the building to the city's electrical, water and sewer grids, Hood said. A 2008 study estimated that restoring the building would cost $200,000-$250,000, according to a previous Missourian report.
Hood hopes that developers will accept these costs if the city offers a low price for the building, as it did with Central Missouri Community Action.
Cedar Albert, who has lived down the street from the building for 10 years, does not like the building's presence in her neighborhood.
"It's nasty, it's ugly, it's hideous, it's an obscenity," Albert said as she tended her garden. "That place keeps going downhill and there's been promise after promise."
Supervising editor is Jacob Kirn.