advertisement

WHAT OTHERS SAY: Gallup poll shows distrust of news media

Thursday, September 27, 2012 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

Here's a little thought experiment to try at home. It might hurt a little bit, but the payoff will be worth it. It concerns the news that the latest Gallup poll shows that only 40 percent of Americans have much trust in the news media.

If you're a Republican, take a few minutes tonight and watch the talking heads at MSNBC spew forth about politics. Lawrence O'Donnell, Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz, take your pick.

Take your blood pressure before the show. Take it again afterward. We bet your numbers will rise. (This is probably a good time to mention you shouldn't do this if you have a heart condition or take high blood pressure medication).

Now, if you're a Democrat, try tuning into Fox News for a while. Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Greta Van Susteren. It doesn't matter. Or, while sipping your morning latte and eating granola, watch "Fox & Friends" as they yuck it up while criticizing President Barack Obama.

Again, we bet your blood pressure will rise.

But it will help explain why Americans trust their media less than they ever have in history.

Gallup says that only 40 percent of Americans trust the media a fair amount or a great deal. It's the lowest number since Gallup has been collecting such data. Slightly more than 60 percent of Americans, on the other hand, don't trust the media very much or not at all.

The numbers have been trending this way since 2004.

It might be mere coincidence, but the distrust began rising just two years after Fox rose to No. 1 in cable ratings. In the modern era, it was the first channel dedicated to telling only one side of the news, and it has become a full-time anti-Obama propaganda machine.

In response, MSNBC, which was founded the same year as Fox (1996), became a full-time liberal cheerleader in about 2005. Now the two networks scream at each other nightly.

But given that there are 311 million Americans and the combined prime viewership for cable news is about 5 million, the distrust can't all be blamed on them.

Republicans have enjoyed great success by making the "lamestream" media a straw man for all of their woes. Former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has built a career on it. Here in Missouri, U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin even blamed the liberal media for his problems when other Republicans called on him to step down from his race against Democrat Claire McCaskill.

Missouri gubernatorial candidate Dave Spence, a Republican, got into the game last week during his debate with Democrat Jay Nixon. Mr. Spence blamed the state's largest newspapers, including us, for focusing on his negatives and not his positives.

Hey, if you say you got an "economics" degree and it turns out it was "home economics," that's not our fault.

The Gallup Poll is disheartening at a time when the media in various forms, through fact-checking, in-depth reporting and thoughtful analysis, are the only recourse for reasoned debate political campaigns hijacked by literally billions of dollars in campaign spending intended to create alternate realities.

But it's also a sign of the times: Americans have lost trust in their major national institutions.

"Yes, the numbers have been creeping up," points out St. Louis University political science professor Ken Warren, "but so have the critical ratings of most of our institutions from the church to Wall Street to our presidents. Americans are very angry today."

Indeed, Gallup reported this year that Americans trust both Congress and the Supreme Court less than ever before.

This is bad for democracy. And screaming at each other doesn't help.

Copyright St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Reprinted with permission. Questions? Contact Opinion editor Elizabeth Conner.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Michael Williams September 27, 2012 | 7:37 a.m.

My sides hurt....another "It ain't us!" article on why the media is distrusted.

The author(s) believes the distrust started once Fox came on line. The notion that Fox came on line BECAUSE there was existing and significant media distrust is not even considered. (And history started the day you were born, too.)

Fox was NOT the "first channel dedicated to telling only one side of the news." ABC, NBC, and CBS had evolved into that honor.

And what are we to make of the Washington Post, NYTimes, LATimes, KCStar, Columbia Tribune and Missourian, and STL Post Dispatch?

What are the counterparts? I can only think of the Washington Times and WSJ.

And THEN the article discusses 3 "lamestream-media-as- straw-man" examples: Akin, Palin and Spence.

All conservatives. What? You couldn't find one single liberal claiming a right-wing conspiracy?

Yes, I do bet that the Gallup Poll is disheartening...to your bottom line. You are right that "through fact-checking, in-depth reporting and thoughtful analysis, are the only recourse for reasoned debate..."

So TRY DOING SOME OF IT!!!!!!!!

You believe our mistrust is because of our anger. Is that what you concluded at the end of your missive?

Well, just maybe our anger at the media is a result of your own performance. Should you consider that as a possibility, that our anger is at your word and grammar biases, at your choices of stories to cover (if at all), your headlines, and/or your paragraph structures?

Comedy con delusion...the media equivalent of chili con carne. Full of gas, too.

(Report Comment)
frank christian September 27, 2012 | 8:32 a.m.

I gave up on Post Dispatch as a news source long before 1996. KFRU once had a "nationally, long time, respected journalist" from stl pd on to share his expertise while delving into the informational value of the Rush Limbaugh radio program. This guy was so important that callers were not allowed to question him without first divulging their name and address.

With this fanfare he proceeded to spew the same canned propaganda from the left that accompanied the Rush popularity at that time. Rush was only an entertainer, etc. All this valuable "lowdown" while mispronouncing the name,every time he uttered it, as in, "Limbaow".

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements