advertisement

WHAT OTHERS SAY: Due diligence reinforced in Mamtek audit

Monday, October 1, 2012 | 8:03 a.m. CDT; updated 1:36 p.m. CDT, Monday, October 1, 2012

Missouri’s experience with the manufacturer Mamtek illustrates the proverb: “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.”

State Auditor Tom Schweich released an audit Tuesday that faulted a state agency, a municipality and private entities for insufficient due diligence before awarding state tax incentives to a proposed manufacturer.

Amid an economic downturn, state and local governments obviously are eager to lure economic development projects.

Such was the case when Mamtek proposed building an artificial sweetener facility in Moberly that would employ 600 people.

The Department of Economic Development approved state tax credits, and Moberly issued $39 million in bonds as incentives for the project.

The project, however, never reached fruition.

The state, thankfully, did not lose any of the $17 million in incentives it offered, which may be the basis for the state’s economic development agency’s response to the audit that it “performed substantial due diligence to the Mamtek project.”

Substantial? Perhaps, but substantial obviously was not enough to prevent damage and repercussions.

So far, they include: The auditor’s findings echo similar criticism from a state legislative panel; Moberly’s credit rating has been downgraded; Missouri’s attorney general has filed theft and fraud charges against Mamtek’s CEO; the federal Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil lawsuit seeking financial penalties against the CEO; and an auction of Mamtek’s assets — such as they are — is scheduled in October.

The defensive response from the department is cavalier and inconsistent with improvements it has made in the due diligence process since the Mamtek debacle.

The enhanced procedures regarding state incentives were commended by Schweich in the audit as “significant improvements.” The auditor tempered his praise, however, by contending the process can be strengthened further.

The Mamtek episode reinforces three points:

• State and local governments must look cautiously before leaping at business proposals.

• Missouri continually must examine how it can tighten due diligence procedures.

• Reform of state tax credits and incentives — on the legislative table for years — is ripe for action.

Missouri and its municipalities must not get fooled again.

Copyright Jefferson City News Tribune. Reprinted with permission. Questions? Contact Opinion editor Elizabeth Conner.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements