WHAT OTHERS SAY: Missouri lawmakers create election mess for Jefferson City

Wednesday, October 3, 2012 | 2:43 p.m. CDT

Well, state lawmakers, here’s another fine mess you’ve gotten the municipalities into.

When the Missouri General Assembly earlier this year approved a law to eliminate the February primary and June elections, the law of unintended consequences also was triggered.

A consequence in this case was action Monday by the Jefferson City Council to schedule its primary in March — a postponement from the traditional February date.

The action set in motion yet another consequence because the ballot for the April election is printed prior to the March primary date.

How did this fine mess occur?

Lack of foresight by state lawmakers is the answer — or, in the words of City Attorney Drew Hilpert, the legislature was “stupid.”

During the regular session, lawmakers approved and the governor signed a bill to abolish the February and June election dates. The rationale was downsizing the number of annual election dates would save money and prevent governments from “slipping things past the voters.”

(As an aside, we find the latter argument disingenuous; no issue “slips through” in this age of perpetual news coverage).

Jefferson City officials were informed by their state counterparts the change would not impact charter cities, including ours.

That information was not entirely correct.

Jefferson City would have been exempt if its charter specified a February primary. It does not.

Consequently, the city’s options are: amend the charter to specify February, eliminate the primary completely or move it.

The first two options are impossible to accomplish before next year’s primary because either would require passage of a charter amendment, which cannot be placed before voters until the April election.

The council adopted its only recourse, a March primary, which invites the future ballot-printing problem. Presumably, officials will cross that bridge as they approach it, rather than when they arrive at it.

In the interim, council members are likely to explore whether Jefferson City voters should decide whether a primary is needed, at all. Municipal elections are nonpartisan, and the primary has offered an opportunity to bypass the April election and win an office outright.

Moving the entire process to April is possible, though it creates the possibility of crowded fields for an elective office. For example, a dozen candidates for mayor sets up the possibility of electing a chief executive by a modest plurality.

A future question may be not whether eliminating the February primary is doable, but whether it is desirable.

Copyright Jefferson City News Tribune. Reprinted with permission.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.