Audit focuses on Missouri public defender caseloads

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 | 9:02 p.m. CDT; updated 11:23 p.m. CDT, Wednesday, October 10, 2012

JEFFERSON CITY — Missouri Auditor Tom Schweich raised concerns Wednesday about how the state public defender system tracks attorney caseloads.

The state audit concluded the public defender system does not have enough information to accurately determine the staffing and resources needed to manage workloads, while noting that public defenders have seen a significant uptick in caseloads.

The public defender system has maximum caseload standards for offices across Missouri. When those limits are exceeded for three consecutive months, the public defender director can opt to certify that an office has limited availability to accept new cases. Leaders in the public defender system then are supposed to work with prosecutors and judges to reduce demand for public defenders. New cases can be refused for the public defender office if an agreement is not reached.

Schweich said the public defender system has been using a "bad baseline" to determine caseloads. Instead of calculating the actual time spent on different types of cases, the system has used a national standard from 1973, he said. The auditor also questioned whether the calculation of how much work must be completed and the public defenders' capacity to do it allows for a valid comparison.

He said the current method would tend to overstate workloads.

"Now they still may be overworked, but because they're not using actual data and because they are using an apples to oranges methodological comparison, it will overstate their workload," Schweich said.

Cat Kelly, the director of the public defender system, said an expert the system consulted indicated Missouri public defenders have been significantly overloaded.

Kelly said officials have started to track time spent on different types of cases and are working to develop a better system for managing caseloads. However, she said there needs to be a method for controlling workloads to ensure public defenders are not assigned too many clients. The state must provide a lawyer to anyone accused of a crime that carries a possible jail or prison sentence if that person can't afford to pay for an attorney.

"When you're drowning, you don't wait for the perfect lifeboat, you grab the log that goes past," Kelly said. "We are working on the perfect lifeboat. We hope to have it out and make it usable and seaworthy for the long haul. But right now we are using the current protocol that we have to keep people's heads above water."

Currently, the public defender system has limited cases for 27 trial and four appellate offices. The move affects criminal courts in 90 of Missouri's 114 counties.

Boone is among those counties. On Oct. 1, the Boone County Public Defender's began operating under a monthly caseload restriction. Under a new protocol, private attorneys will take on some misdemeanor and felony probation violation cases.

Concern about Missouri's public defender system has percolated for years.

A special state legislative committee studied the issue in 2006. Three years later, lawmakers approved a measure that would have allowed the Public Defender Commission to set maximum caseload standards and establish waiting lists, but the bill was vetoed by Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon.

Missouri prosecutors have questioned whether public defenders face a problem with caseloads. The Missouri Association of Prosecuting Attorneys said Wednesday the state audit "shatters the unsupported claim of a 'constitutional caseload crisis'" and that public defenders have refused to represent poor defendants without reliable data.

The prosecutors' group suggested public defenders be reserved for people accused of murder, sexual offenses and other serious felonies with private lawyers contracted to represent those accused of misdemeanors and low-level felonies.


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Jeremy Calton October 10, 2012 | 9:54 p.m.

In Missouri (and the rest of the US) the Prosecutor's Office and the Public Defender are "separate but equal."

The illusion of a fair trial and innocent until proven guilty is a sad joke; the resources devoted to prosecutors far outweighs what's at the disposal of public defenders.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.