GUEST COMMENTARY: Utility practices threaten Missouri's trees

Sunday, October 28, 2012 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

We always loved trees, but we only recently learned how important they are. Trees preserve the planet and us by providing oxygen, absorbing greenhouse gases and pollutants, purifying water, helping make rain and protecting the earth from harmful temperature changes. A future without the benefits of trees would be dire. Yet electric cooperatives in Missouri have been clearing massive numbers of trees in far greater swaths than ever before.

We had a unique property in one of the few wooded locations in our area. The surrounding trees provided privacy and seclusion, and the road was lined with cedars that blocked the wind and filtered road dust. Although we were told that our trees did not immediately threaten its lines, the power company, an electric co-op, removed the woods on our property from 15 to 25 feet deep all along the 1,000-foot west boundary. We don’t know exactly how many dozens of our trees were removed because right after they were whacked against our stated wishes, they were dragged to a burn pile on someone else’s property across the road.

Why are they killing so many trees?

Across the country, utilities have adopted more aggressive vegetation management policies. Rather than trimming as they used to do and unbeknownst to many property owners, utilities are clear cutting any vegetation they expect will grow to a certain height (i.e. 12’ to 15’), and doing so along the full width of a right of way up to 150 feet on both sides of a power line.

These utilities claim that clear cutting enables them to ensure a safe and reliable power distribution system that meets strict federal guidelines. But there are no federal mandates or industry standards that endorse or require this kind of cutting clearance, despite utility after utility using this excuse with customers and local officials to justify their aggressive policies. Federal mandates apply to lines greater than 200,000 volts, maybe 3 percent of the system, rather than the more numerous lower-voltage lines that deliver power to most neighborhoods.

Actually, expanded clear cutting and spraying with herbicides are short-sighted and destructive practices that allow utilities to reduce costs because they won’t have to do vegetation maintenance as often. Their cost savings come at the expense of millions, maybe billions, of dollars’ worth of property, property value, and benefits that landowners and communities are losing.

In Missouri, extreme and unreasonable policies threaten constitutional rights as well as trees.

Throwing its considerable weight around, the co-op told us it had an easement, but never produced it. We later learned that co-ops are using Section 537.340 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, which (1) created extensive, one-size-fits-all cutting distances that allow utilities to clear cut trees in massive numbers for 30, 50, 75 or more feet deep on both sides of a power line and (2) appears to authorize their taking enormous amounts of private property, without consent, without having to secure or follow an easement, and without providing compensation or due process. The utilities can cut deep into a property — far in excess of national and industry standards and practices — and they may also be using this law to take trees beyond the right of way and then assume control over what owners are able to do with their private property after the vegetation is removed to ensure that trees don't grow there again. According to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling (Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.), any permanent physical occupation of private property that is authorized by the government requires just compensation.

Missouri’s utilities are getting away with destroying Missouri’s trees in massive numbers, misleading us by blaming federal regulations and using a state law that is probably unconstitutional so they can reduce their costs at the expense of citizens’ rights and thousands of beneficial trees. With no effective limit to the amount of trees that can be cut, and no apparent state agency with oversight authority to rein in coops, scenic woodland rights-of-way are being turned into broad, unproductive meadows (or worse). In the process, trees that don't pose a threat and are unlikely to ever cause a problem are in jeopardy.

Citizens and public officials must decide whether the grave effects of excessive and over-aggressive clear cutting by utilities are worth the cost we will all pay. The more they cut, the more we all lose. Please contact your legislators and the attorney general and urge them to revisit and reform 537.340. Tell them that Missouri landscape and your property and due process rights are at stake.

Terry Huey is with Missouri Trees Matter. This commentary was distributed by Missouri Forum.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Williams October 28, 2012 | 10:29 a.m.

I like trees, too. I've planted and continue to tend over 1000 walnut, pecan, and oak trees on my farm. I've also performed timber stand improvement on my forests that kill many trees to the benefit of those that remain. My forest is healthier and, once I burn the ground litter this winter, they'll be even healthier.

I also like power to my home. I don't like the loss of power due to a tree toppling a power line. Folks on the east coast are about to find out they don't like this much either.

I favor keeping power lines free of things that can interrupt power transmission.

I remind the author that trees are not the only plant life "providing oxygen, absorbing greenhouse gases and pollutants, purifying water, helping make rain and protecting the earth from harmful temperature changes."

Grasses and forbs do the same thing.

This area in which you live, Terry, was a pre-Columbian savanna once upon a time. Our loathing of fire allow this area (and most of northern Missouri) to become the forests you see today.

Perhaps you should make lemonade when given lemons. If you have bare areas under power lines or along roads, why not scatter savanna seeds like the bluestems, gammas, side-oats, indian grass, and the endless variety of forbs? Make your own savanna! We have several sources of this seed within this state, and most of the seed is FROM Missouri, so you'll be planting native stuff. I've done this on 15 acres of my land, and you should, too.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams October 28, 2012 | 10:34 a.m.

Oh, one other thing, Terry.

When the tree crews come through and make mulch of all those trees, ask that they dump the mulch in an out-of-the-way area of your place. Let the mulch sit for a year to leach out the acidity.

Free mulch.

Lots of it.

Woods are neat, but keep in mind what this area once was.

(Report Comment)
Corey Parks October 28, 2012 | 6:17 p.m.

I would like to also add that there are more trees and green areas in the United States today then there were 150 years ago. It sucks that they cut trees on your land but just know that more are being planted elsewhere at a growing rate.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz October 29, 2012 | 11:07 a.m.

It would be interesting if the Missourian or the author would provide the name of the cooperative. I'm curious if it's Boone Electric, or if the author lives elsewhere in Missouri?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.