advertisement

GUEST COMMENTARY: Smoking is jeopardizing the health of our students

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 | 2:40 p.m. CDT

As leaders of two of Missouri’s largest public education systems, more than 90,000 students and their parents place their trust in us. At first blush, our jobs are pretty straightforward: grow and shape young, eager minds to become tomorrow’s leaders.

The reality, though, is much different — and much more complex.

As education leaders, our job is to cultivate the student as a whole, to help them grow and thrive personally, and to care for their health and safety so that one day, their contributions can benefit all of society. The problem is, education doesn’t exist in a vacuum, and it doesn’t easily overcome sometimes negative outside influences.

Case in point: More than 30 percent of Columbia Public Schools’ students admit to smoking all or part of a cigarette — and more than 17 percent of those students smoke at least half a pack a day, according to a 2010 Columbia Public Schools survey. About 6 percent of students on University of Missouri System campuses smoke cigarettes each and every day.

These numbers are really microcosms of Missouri as a whole. Our state has the 11th highest smoking rate and the 39th lowest life expectancy in the country. Nearly 9,000 Missouri kids start smoking each year.

Why? Probably lots of reasons, but at the top of our list is the low cost of cigarettes due in large part to low taxes. In fact, Missouri has the lowest tobacco tax in the nation at 17 cents a pack. The national average is $1.49. This puts the price of cigarettes and tobacco products easily within reach of most teens’ purchasing power.

A new approach will soon be before voters.

Proposition B would help address Missouri’s health, smoking and school funding problems through a 73-cent tax increase on cigarettes and other tobacco products.

Increasing the price of cigarettes and tobacco products is a proven way to decrease smoking rates, especially in children. National data shows that for every 10 percent increase in cigarette taxes, cigarette consumption among the general population declines 4 percent. And studies show that youth are three times more sensitive to price than adults—and because 90 percent of smokers start smoking in their teen years, higher taxes can sharply reduce smoking rates in the long run.

In short, experts estimate that this proposed tax increase would prevent 40,100 kids from becoming addicted adult smokers, and it would cause 33,000 adult smokers to quit.

What’s the big deal with smoking, some may wonder? The health implications should be obvious, but for the record, smoking leads to five times higher mortality rates in the U.S., as well as higher rates of heart and lung disease, stroke and cancer. And a new study published in the Archives of General Psychiatry also shows that smoking is associated with cognitive declines starting in midlife that are similar to 10 years of aging.

Plus, the health care costs associated with smoking are astronomical. Missouri spends $2.13 billion on health care costs directly related to smoking each year. More than half of this money could be saved from declines in youth and adult smoking if Proposition B passes.

Educators do their best to convince kids not to smoke. We have Wellness Centers on our University of Missouri System campuses that offer free smoking cessation programs and products. In our elementary, middle and high schools, we hold assemblies about the health effects of smoking, equip our guidance counselors with information they can use to influence students not to smoke and even teach the dangers of smoking in our health and science classes.

We’re seeing success through these efforts, but more is needed. When 25 percent of K-12 students indicate that they feel it is not wrong at all — or only slightly wrong — to smoke, we’re fighting an uphill battle.

We already know the counter-argument: Missouri is adverse to new taxes. But it also is important to know the facts in this particular case. Proposition B would bring the new tax total for cigarettes and tobacco products to 90 cents — still well below the national average of $1.49 per pack and keeping Missouri in the bottom half of state tobacco taxes. Illinois just raised its cigarette tax by $1, more than is being proposed in Missouri.

It’s also worth noting that in addition to stemming the number of youth who smoke, proceeds from the increased cigarette tax would be used for smoking prevention and cessation programs statewide, as well as be allocated for elementary and secondary education classrooms to help prevent staff reductions and increased classroom size. Missouri colleges and universities also would benefit from funds used to support education opportunities for students and future caregivers.

It’s been a tough lesson for us to learn, but education alone is not eliminating smoking among our students. We in the education business know that something more needs to be done. When heading to the polls in November, we ask that you, too, think about the health and well-being of our students.

Tim Wolfe is president of the UM System, and Chris Belcher is superintendent for Columbia Public Schools.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Skip Yates October 30, 2012 | 8:40 p.m.

I think there are a lot more things to worry about than student smoking.....failures in education, teen pregnancy, gang-banging, drop-outs, etc. However, tackling these issues don't have a potential of bringing $$$$$ into the school system. A rice-paper argument Misters Wolf and Belcher.

(Report Comment)
frank christian October 30, 2012 | 9:11 p.m.

Hear, hear, Mr. Yates!

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams October 30, 2012 | 10:31 p.m.

"smoking prevention and cessation programs"
______________________

We already blew that money from the tobacco settlement.

Give me one good reason the same won't happen again. "You say so" isn't a good enough reason.

And I really tire of the "education" component. Given the "dollar in-dollar out bait-and-switch history of this state, why should I trust you now?

You want to sell a means to reduce smoking? Fine, do so. But don't tell me that cessation and education will be beneficiaries, because I simply do not believe you. You're using cessation and education programs to sell your tax increase as an appeal to emotion that is false. That's because you can't sell a tax for general revenues alone.

Despicable politics, politicians, and actions that I will not forget...regardless of the outcome. I hope my fellow voters will do the same.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements