advertisement

Planning and Zoning Commission to address Route K housing project

Sunday, December 2, 2012 | 4:44 p.m. CST; updated 4:58 p.m. CST, Sunday, December 2, 2012
The Planning and Zoning Commission will address a proposed housing development near Rock Bridge Memorial Park on Thursday.

COLUMBIA — A proposed housing development project just north of Rock Bridge Memorial State Park is scheduled for public hearing at Thursday’s Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.

The 35.8-acre subdivision would contain 76 residential lots — 11 designated for villa-style duplexes and the remaining 65 used for single-family housing. Engineer Tim Crockett said the villas are different from the single-family dwellings because of the architectural constructs, high-end building materials and finishes used to create them.

MoreStory


Related Media

Related Articles

The development would be located off Route K, about 2,000 feet south of the Providence and Old Plank roads intersection, and about three-quarters of the property line's length would border Rock Bridge Memorial State Park to the south.

This tract of land was previously owned by Columbia Independent School, which purchased the site in 2007 before ultimately relocating to the former Toastmasters building on North Stadium Boulevard. Real estate records indicate that the land sold in October to developer Rob Hill, who lives on a property adjacent to the site.

The proposed development has two exit points, both opening onto Route K. Crockett said the traffic engineers with whom he had consulted about potential congestion problems had determined there were no issues with access.

If approved at Thursday's meeting, the development plan will go to the City Council for a first reading on Dec. 17, and a first vote could take place as early as Jan. 7.

Crockett said he hopes to see construction begin next spring or summer if the council approves the project. In the meantime, he said, his firm has been meeting with residents in the area to address their concerns.

“We’re in the process of trying to work with them and gain their support,” he said. “I think we’ve made good-faith efforts, and I think they’re turning out really well.”

Some South Route K-area residents have reservations about the new development.

Sandy McCann, a self-described "sixth-generation Boone County-an," said she and other residents plan to submit a protest petition at the Dec. 17 council meeting.

“It’s an urban development,” she said of the proposal. “Our neighborhood is not urban.”

McCann said about 20 residents attended a Nov. 20 meeting at her house to discuss the development and were “not happy with the answers” they received.

McCann said she has concerns about the lack of representation for residents in the area. Because her neighborhood is located outside city limits, she said, there is nobody on the council representing its residents' interests.

McCann said members of the Planning Commission can anticipate a strong turnout from area residents at Thursday’s meeting.

“I’m expecting to have a crew there,” she said.

Supervising editor is Scott Swafford.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

hank ottinger December 2, 2012 | 10:00 p.m.

This plan strikes me as being rushed. P&Z needs to take a deep breath and, among other things, determine the possible impacts on RBSP and Gans Creek. Consultation with the Department of Natural Resources should be a mandatory first step.

(Report Comment)
Sandy McCann December 3, 2012 | 9:10 a.m.

Yes I totally agree this plan is being rushed. I only found out about this development by a forwarded email on Nov. 16th. The city has been great forwarding me the plans where the density of 3-4 houses per acre is a great concern to all of us along with Duplexes across K.

(Report Comment)
Kevin Gamble December 3, 2012 | 1:46 p.m.

Columbia's developers seem fanatically determined to drain the natural beauty from the area, leaving a trail of hideous, generic, ill-fitting, artificial-feeling, and wholly inferior developments in their wake. It seems that the cash grab for businessmen of a certain age in this town is going full steam, and everything previously thought sacred is being shoveled into the fires of the retirement-money engine as fast as can be done.

The things that make Columbia special are the things that the people working on this development will never understand. And they're trampling it as fast as they can.

(Report Comment)
Richard Saunders December 3, 2012 | 3:26 p.m.

If it were not for the activities of the NOT-federal, NOT-reserve system, NONE of this would occur.

A long, long time ago, when someone loaned you money, they loaned you wealth that already existed. This scarcity of capital placed natural limits upon growth.

These days?

Lenders don't really lend, but instead create the money when someone signs a promissory note, as that's all money is, promissory notes. Since there is no scarcity involved, money can be created for any purpose.

Of course, the primary purpose? To transfer wealth from savers to borrowers, then onto the banking system itself.

If you really want to go after malformed growth, one should learn to identify and then target the source.

Oh, and this is the exact same mechanism that is destroying our productive base. Meanwhile, the evil-doers in DC play their little tax games of divide and conquer, in an effort to appear to act like adults.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams December 3, 2012 | 3:30 p.m.

KevinG: It's odd that you and others always blame the "developers", yet do not acknowledge this thing called "demand".

Do buyers...who create demand...have culpability, too?

What is your response when government prevents the "making" of something you want?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements