advertisement

DAVID ROSMAN: Online cheating devalues education

Wednesday, December 5, 2012 | 6:00 a.m. CST; updated 6:40 p.m. CST, Wednesday, December 5, 2012

I am not technophobic!

As we head toward the plethora of winter celebrations, Muharram, Chanukah, winter solstice, Christmas and the western New Year's, I am stuck on stories that seem to have disappeared from our collective radars — the end of the world, student ethics and Internet-based learning.

OK, the first might seem relatively important, but how much faith do we really have in the Mayan calendar’s last day? Is the world going to end Dec. 21? And if it does, who would be left to care?  Morbid, I know, but true.

It is the education of our future leaders of business and government that causes me to pause and wonder if American exceptionalism has indeed reached its evolutionary downturn. It is my concern that a great part of this loss of being “first in everything” is due to our businesses' and universities' myopic vision of the future — all technology all of the time.

I know that this will put me in a hot seat with the Web-based leaning leaders, but we have forgotten what college is supposed to produce — graduates with superior intellectual and ethical skills. If the companies are happy with the products, they will seek more and the institutions will grow and prosper. Basic college economics.

The end product is the true missions of higher education — not to teach a specific skill, but to teach students how to ask questions, to think and listen critically, to maintain superior interpersonal skills and self-esteem, and loftier ethical judgment. These are not skills that can be taught in a realm where people are encouraged to isolate themselves from the world and handed the means to cheat.

Why is this coming up at the end of the fall term? Because of an email I received.

The opening line seemed pretty straight forward, “We are College Report Source, the Internet’s premier source for tutors.” Unfortunately, they do not conduct tutoring in the true sense of the word. What they do offer is cheating.

College Report Source, along with its brethren, do three things that are at best questionable, at worse the encouragement of cheating. Its “associates” will write an applicant’s college admission paper, a student’s term or research paper, and/or offer to complete one’s online class, all for a hefty fee.

And College Report Source is not the only company offering these services. BoostMyGrades.com, onlineclasshelpers.com, professionalessay.com, and oh so many others.

For how much? I was quoted prices starting at $800 for someone to take a computer class on my behalf. A 30-page paper on “Descartes and Spinoza references to God” will start at $750. The top price for the paper was a bit over $1,100. For the class, $1,500. Not bad if cheating were acceptable.

All of the “services” tell the student that papers would be run through various programs, including Google, TurnItIn.com and WriteCheck.com, to eliminate any possible signs of plagiarism. Some misspellings and grammatical errors will be kept to fool the instructor. There are even guarantees of “advanced” grades.

No matter how it is done, these services of cheating will produce a poor graduate and any advantage American colleges have in the world of education will suffer.

Worse, the colleges and universities are unwittingly encouraging students to cheat by endorsing online programs over in-seat learning, leaving them unsupervised, permitting most improprieties to remain unchecked.

Online cheating services are not the only culprits. Nicholas Carr speculated in the London Telegraph “How the Internet is making us stupid.” In his essay, Carr suggests that a “growing body of scientific evidence suggests that the net, with its constant distractions and interruptions, is turning us into scattered and superficial thinkers.”

Stanford University’s Gerald Crabtree wrote in the scientific journal Trends in Genetics that evolution may be a cause of making us less than our hunter-gatherer ancestors because we are no longer use our brains to their fullest capacity, to survive day-to-day living.

Want proof? Ask the college kid behind any retail counter to count back your change — without the computer.

When used properly, the Internet and computers are wonderful things. It is unfortunate that our institutes of higher education encourage artificial intelligence to the real thing and cheating to true educational ethics.

David Rosman is an editor, writer, professional speaker and college instructor in communications, ethics, business and politics. Questions? Contact Opinion editor Elizabeth Conner.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Michael Williams December 5, 2012 | 8:24 a.m.

Sound the trumpets!
Hark the Herald Angels Sing!
It truly must be the end of the world!

Rosman and I agree COMPLETELY!

PS: No corrections/additions at all. I'm stunned and completely nonfunctional. Sumbody pinch me.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams December 5, 2012 | 8:40 a.m.

OK, I take back the "no additions" comment.

Getting a college education just for the "sheepskin" is a horrible thing to do to yourself. 'Tis true, that "sheepskin" does open doors otherwise closed, but when that door opens and you step through, you still have to perform acceptably. An education based upon cheating or selective internet learning becomes quite obvious to bosses in a real hurry.

(Report Comment)
Charles leverett December 5, 2012 | 9:36 a.m.

Two things:
You also forgot to mention the ability to get test banks and solution manuals for textbook online, and it seems many, if not most online (and perhaps in seat, but I haven't done many in seat classes) use these test banks.

Second:
Online classes aren't bad, for some they are the only option, and frankly you could use the services describe above in a sit down class, well at least the paper writing. Also most online classes require you to take a proctored exams (someone has to watch you, keep you from cheating, many times has to be taken at the college campus), if you aren't reading the material, doing the home work, you probably won't do all that great.
Though from my experience with Columbia College, the main problems with online classes can be the teachers, many of them seem to pay minimal attention to the class itself, and at least for CC, all online classes use a syllabub created by someone besides the teacher.

A bonus third point:
Most college students won't be able to afford $800 to $1500 for cheating, this seems more geared towards the working adult.

(Report Comment)
David Rosman December 5, 2012 | 2:31 p.m.

Just a note. I am taking an online class from Duke University on Argument and Persuasion. There is no reason I could not flash through the program's exams and exercises without listening to a lecture because I can use the "back button" to correct any answer I may have gotten wrong.

Using the threaded discussion, I have to wait days (four at last count) before I receive a response.

If it were not for my integrity and wanting to learn, and if the class were for more than a certificate of completion, cheating would be very easy. How unfortunate.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams December 5, 2012 | 3:28 p.m.

David: Two things........

(1) That doesn't say good things about Duke University, and
(2) Perhaps you should use what you learn from "Argument and Persuasion" and get them to change. In fact, I would suggest that as your final exam.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements